Relational ownership, institutional context, and internationalization of state-owned enterprises: When and how are multinational co-owners a plus?

被引:33
作者
Mariotti, Sergio [1 ]
Marzano, Riccardo [2 ]
机构
[1] DIG Politecn Milano, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
[2] DIAG Sapienza Univ Roma, Dept Comp Control & Management Engn, Via Ariosto 25, I-00185 Rome, Italy
关键词
institutional theory; internationalization; multinational enterprises; relational ownership; state-owned enterprises; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PANEL-DATA; CAPITALISM; GOVERNMENT; BUSINESS; DIVERSIFICATION; VARIETIES;
D O I
10.1002/gsj.1379
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Summary We investigate when and how a foreign multinational enterprise by acting as a relational co-owner helps the internationalization of hybrid state-owned enterprises. We merge the "liability of stateness" and the "government as strategist" perspectives with an institutional context-based approach. We claim that the effect of multinational enterprise relational co-ownership is contingent on the countries' institutional settings. It is positive at lower levels of both institutional coordination (as a measure of variety of capitalism) and government effectiveness. This effect is mitigated as coordination and government effectiveness increase. Further, a comparison between hybrid state-owned and private-owned enterprises shows that the magnitude of the contribution by foreign relational co-owners to internationalization is also moderated by institutional variables. Managerial Summary Opportunities and challenges for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to expand their activities abroad and to climb the rankings of the world-class multinational corporations have been emerging. However, these enterprises often lack the experience required for internationalization and suffer from the inward-looking orientation and political interferences of their national governments. This is especially true when governments are ineffective in getting things done, and the local institutions limit their role to sustaining a positive regulatory internal market, but with no strategy to promote multinational state-owned players. Under these conditions, the co-ownership with a foreign proactive industrial partner can be an effective strategy for SOEs to overcome the difficulties in entering foreign markets.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 812
页数:34
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Grogaard, Birgitte .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2019, 50 (01) :20-35
[2]   Global corporate governance: On the relevance of firms' ownership structure [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Crespi-Cladera, Rafel .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2016, 51 (01) :50-57
[3]  
Aharoni Y, 2018, JIBS SPEC COLLECT, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-51715-5_2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Austria Reporting of cross-border services for balance of payments and international investment position statistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J WORLD BUSINESS
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Institutional Paper 31
[8]  
[Anonymous], Privatisation and the Broadening of Ownership of State-Owned Enterprises
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, OECD Size and sector distribution of state-owned enterprises
[10]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297