The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures

被引:3
作者
Gong, Maosheng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Bo [3 ]
Zuo, Zhanxuan [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Jing [4 ]
Zhang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Earthquake Engn & Engn Vibrat, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Emergency Management, Key Lab Earthquake Disaster Mitigat, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
[3] Yantai Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Yantai 264005, Peoples R China
[4] Heilongjiang Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
RC frame; collapse capacity; strong column-weak beam; flexural strength ratio of columns to beams; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; DAMAGE; BUILDINGS; BEHAVIOR; FAILURE;
D O I
10.3390/buildings12081219
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reinforced concrete (RC) frames are designed based on the strong column-weak beam (SCWB) philosophy to reduce structural damage and collapse during earthquakes. The SCWB design philosophy is ensured by the required minimum flexural strength ratio of columns to beams (FSRCB) in the seismic code. Quantifying the relationship between the FSRCB and the collapse capacity of the frames may facilitate the efficient assessment of the seismic performance of the existing or newly designed RC frames. This paper investigates the influence of different FSRCBs on the collapse capacity of three- and nine-story RC frames designed according to Chinese seismic codes. The results show that the collapse capacities of the RC frames can be efficiently improved by increasing the FSRCB, and the collapse capacities of frames with FSRCB = 2.0 are improved by approximately 1.6-2.0 times compared with those of the frames with FSRCB = 1.2. Compared with the middle- or high-rise (nine-story) frames, it is more efficient to improve the collapse capacity for low-rise (three-story) frames by increasing the value of CBFSR. The logarithmic standard deviation of the collapse capacity of the RC frames designed according to the Chinese seismic codes ranges from 0.5-0.9, which is larger than the proposed maximum logarithmic standard deviation (0.4) in FEMA P695.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, FEMA351, V351
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Quantification of building seismic performance factors, P695
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, P318
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2004, EUROCODE 8 N
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, GB50011-2010, V2016
  • [7] What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?
    Arslan, M. H.
    Korkmaz, H. H.
    [J]. ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2007, 14 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [8] Bondy K.D., 1996, Earthquake Spectra, V12, P395, DOI [10.1193/1.1585890, DOI 10.1193/1.1585890]
  • [9] Evaluation of seismic vulnerability of a complex RC existing building by linear and nonlinear modeling approaches
    Caprili, Silvia
    Nardini, Luca
    Salvatore, Walter
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 10 (03) : 913 - 954
  • [10] Minimum column-to-beam strength ratios for beam-hinge mechanisms based on multi-objective seismic design
    Choi, Se Woon
    Kim, Yousok
    Lee, Jaehong
    Hong, Kappyo
    Park, Hyo Seon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2013, 88 : 53 - 62