Comparison and integration of feature reduction methods for land cover classification with RapidEye imagery

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Xianju [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Weitao [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cheng, Xinwen [5 ]
Liao, Yiwei [6 ]
Chen, Gang [5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Fac Comp Sci, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Hubei Key Lab Intelligent Geoinformat Proc, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Geol Survey, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 Enschede, Netherlands
[5] China Univ Geosci, Fac Informat Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Feature reduction; Support vector machine; Remote sensing; Land cover classification; RapidEye; OBJECT-BASED CLASSIFICATION; GROUNDWATER-DEPENDENT ECOSYSTEMS; FEATURE-SELECTION; LIDAR DATA; RANDOM FOREST; MULTISPECTRAL DATA; GORGES; VEGETATION; DESERTIFICATION; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-016-4311-4
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Feature reduction (FR) methods can effectively reduce the feature set and improve the accuracy for land cover classification (LCC) using high resolution remote sensing data with high dimensional or strongly correlated feature sets. However, FR methods have rarely been applied for LCC in arid regions with complex geographic environments, especially for the integration of feature selection (FS) and feature extraction (FE) methods. This study investigated the comparison and integration of FR methods for LCC in part of Dunhuang Basin, northwestern China, which is a typical inland arid region and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Five spectral bands and 9 vegetation indices features that derived from RapidEye satellite imagery were used with support vector machines algorithm. Two wrapper FS methods, based on random forest algorithm (varSelRF and Boruta packages in R software), were used. Three FE methods (principal component analysis, PCA; independent component analysis, ICA; and minimum noise fraction transformation, MNF), were employed to extract a reduced number of reconstructed new features. Integration of varSelRF and PCA methods (varSelRF-PCA) was attempted. All 14 features were relevant, indicated by Boruta method; only 6 features, including the red-edge band selected by the varSelRF module, had higher importance. All the five FR methods could improve classification accuracy, but only varSelRF achieved significant improvement. The varSelRF outperformed the FE methods, followed by MNF, PCA, and ICA. The proposed varSelRF-PCA model significantly improved classification accuracy and outperformed all the FS or FE methods.
引用
收藏
页码:23041 / 23057
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal selection of remote sensing feature variables for land cover classification
    Zeng, Wen
    Lin, Hui
    Yan, Enping
    Jiang, Qian
    Lu, Hongwang
    Wu, Simin
    2018 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON EARTH OBSERVATION AND REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS (EORSA), 2018, : 246 - 250
  • [32] Multiscale Feature Reconstruction and Interclass Attention Weighting for Land Cover Classification
    Zhan, Zongqian
    Xiong, Zirou
    Huang, Xin
    Yang, Chun
    Liu, Yi
    Wang, Xin
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 17 : 1921 - 1937
  • [33] Efficient Deep Semantic Segmentation for Land Cover Classification Using Sentinel Imagery
    Tzepkenlis, Anastasios
    Marthoglou, Konstantinos
    Grammalidis, Nikos
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [34] Land cover classification based on the PSPNet and superpixel segmentation methods with high spatial resolution multispectral remote sensing imagery
    Yuan, Xiaolei
    Chen, Zeqiang
    Chen, Nengcheng
    Gong, Jianya
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 15 (03)
  • [35] Land-cover classification and analysis of change using machine-learning classifiers and multi-temporal remote sensing imagery
    Keshtkar, Hamidreza
    Voigt, Winfried
    Alizadeh, Esmaeil
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (06)
  • [36] How Well Do Deep Learning-Based Methods for Land Cover Classification and Object Detection Perform on High Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery?
    Zhang, Xin
    Han, Liangxiu
    Han, Lianghao
    Zhu, Liang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [37] OPTICAL AND SAR IMAGERY INTEGRATION BASED ON CLOUD COMPUTING FOR LAND COVER MAPPING IN THE CERRADO
    Pires Silva, Angela Gabrielly
    Cremon, Edipo Henrique
    Boggione, Giovanni de Araujo
    Alves, Fabio Correa
    REVISTA GEOARAGUAIA, 2021, 11 : 85 - 106
  • [38] Multiscale Context-Aware Feature Fusion Network for Land-Cover Classification of Urban Scene Imagery
    Siddique, Abubakar
    Li, Zhengzhou
    Azeem, Abdullah
    Zhang, Yuting
    Xu, Bitong
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 16 : 8475 - 8491
  • [39] Deep Feature Clustering for Remote Sensing Imagery Land Cover Analysis
    Gargees, Rasha S.
    Scott, Grant J.
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 17 (08) : 1386 - 1390
  • [40] Integrated Airborne LiDAR Data and Imagery for Suburban Land Cover Classification Using Machine Learning Methods
    Mo, You
    Zhong, Ruofei
    Sun, Haili
    Wu, Qiong
    Du, Liming
    Geng, Yuxin
    Cao, Shisong
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (09)