Five pillars for stakeholder analyses in sustainability transformations: The global case of phosphorus

被引:29
作者
Lyon, Christopher [1 ]
Cordell, Dana [2 ]
Jacobs, Brent [2 ]
Martin-Ortega, Julia [1 ]
Marshall, Rachel [3 ]
Camargo-Valero, Miller Alonso [4 ]
Sherry, Erin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Inst Sustainable Futures, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, BioResource Syst Res Grp, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Agrifood & Biosci Inst, Belfast BT9 5PQ, Antrim, North Ireland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Phosphorus; Sustainability; Transformations; Stakeholders; Natural resources; Food systems; Food security; Agriculture; Water; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; FOOD SECURITY; RESILIENCE; POWER; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORK; ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Phosphorus is a critical agricultural nutrient and a major pollutant in waterbodies due to inefficient use. In the form of rock phosphate it is a finite global commodity vulnerable to price shocks and sourcing challenges. Transforming toward sustainable phosphorus management involves local to global stakeholders. Conventional readings of stakeholders may not reflect system complexity leaving it difficult to see stakeholder roles in transformations. We attempt to remedy this issue with a novel stakeholder analysis method based on five qualitative pillars: stakeholder agency, system roles, power and influence, alignment to the problem, and transformational potential. We argue that our approach suits case studies of individual stakeholders, stakeholder groups, and organisations with relationships to sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Abson DJ., 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI [10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y]
  • [2] Social and ecological resilience: are they related?
    Adger, WN
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
  • [4] Archer M. S., 2000, Being human: The problem of agency
  • [5] A dynamic conceptualization of power for sustainability research
    Avelino, Flor
    Rotmans, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (08) : 796 - 804
  • [6] Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come
    Barad, Karen
    [J]. DERRIDA TODAY, 2010, 3 (02) : 240 - 268
  • [7] Barad Karen, 2007, M UNIVERSE HALFWAY Q
  • [8] A national approach for transformation of the UK food system
    Bhunnoo, Riaz
    Poppy, Guy M.
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2020, 1 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [9] Phosphorus use efficiency and fertilizers: future opportunities for improvements
    Blackwell, Martin
    Darch, Tegan
    Haslam, Richard
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 6 (04) : 332 - 340
  • [10] The Dark Side of Transformation: Latent Risks in Contemporary Sustainability Discourse
    Blythe, Jessica
    Silver, Jennifer
    Evans, Louisa
    Armitage, Derek
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Brown, Katrina
    [J]. ANTIPODE, 2018, 50 (05) : 1206 - 1223