Inhibitory control - Important trait for explosive detection performance in police dogs?

被引:23
作者
Tiira, Katriina [1 ,2 ]
Tikkanen, Antti [3 ]
Vainio, Outi [2 ]
机构
[1] SmartDOG, Pietilankatu 5, Ruhimaki 11130, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Equine & Small Anim Med, POB 57, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Police Dog Training Ctr, Koirakoulunkatu, FI-13130 Hameenlinna, Finland
关键词
Cognition; Dog; Inhibitory control; Motor inhibition; Explosive detection; Working dog; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; BEHAVIOR; IMPULSIVITY; TEMPERAMENT; PREDICT; HUMANS; BACK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104942
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Working dogs are used for a range of important operational tasks. Identifying potentially successful working dogs as early as possible is important as rejection rates are high and training is costly. Earlier research has mainly concentrated on personality traits such as boldness, and there is only little knowledge on the possible association between cognitive traits and the actual working dog performance. This study investigated whether motor inhibition, persistence, problem-solving strategies, and spatial problem-solving are associated with explosive detection success in specially trained police dogs. Dogs (N = 24) were tested with a cognitive test battery, and subsequently they participated in an explosive detection test. The explosive searching situation and the location of the test was such that it would reflect as much as possible a real-life situation. Canine handlers also filled in a questionnaire regarding their dog's working behaviour. We found that those dogs that were more successful in explosive detection task had better motor inhibition in a cylinder task compared to dogs with lower success in an explosive search task. Furthermore, we found that dogs that made more errors in the cylinder task were generally more likely to give up searching sooner, as reported by their handlers, and also abandon sooner the problem-solving task in behavioural test. This study suggests that inhibitory control, specifically motor inhibition, may be an important aspect to consider when selecting suitable dogs for explosive detection tasks. Cylinder task is an easy and quick way to assess inhibitory control, although a larger dataset is needed to verify its association with working performance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Brown Lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) Can Master the Qualitative Version of the Reverse-Reward Contingency
    Glady, Yannick
    Genty, Emilie
    Roeder, Jean-Jacques
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (10):
  • [22] Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field
    Griffin, Andrea S.
    Guillette, Lauren M.
    Healy, Susan D.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2015, 30 (04) : 207 - 214
  • [23] When the Nose Doesn't Know: Canine Olfactory Function Associated With Health, Management, and Potential Links to Microbiota
    Jenkins, Eileen K.
    DeChant, Mallory T.
    Perry, Erin B.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [24] Persistence and human-directed behavior in detection dogs: Ontogenetic development and relationships to working dog success
    Lazarowski, Lucia
    Strassberg, Lily R.
    Waggoner, L. Paul
    Katz, Jeffrey S.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2019, 220
  • [25] Enhanced Selection of Assistance and Explosive Detection Dogs Using Cognitive Measures
    MacLean, Evan L.
    Hare, Brian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [26] The evolution of self-control
    MacLean, Evan L.
    Hare, Brian
    Nunn, Charles L.
    Addessi, Elsa
    Amici, Federica
    Anderson, Rindy C.
    Aureli, Filippo
    Baker, Joseph M.
    Bania, Amanda E.
    Barnard, Allison M.
    Boogert, Neeltje J.
    Brannon, Elizabeth M.
    Bray, Emily E.
    Bray, Joel
    Brent, Lauren J. N.
    Burkart, Judith M.
    Call, Josep
    Cantlon, Jessica F.
    Cheke, Lucy G.
    Clayton, Nicola S.
    Delgado, Mikel M.
    DiVincenti, Louis J.
    Fujita, Kazuo
    Herrmann, Esther
    Hiramatsu, Chihiro
    Jacobs, Lucia F.
    Jordan, Kerry E.
    Laude, Jennifer R.
    Leimgruber, Kristin L.
    Messer, Emily J. E.
    Moura, Antonio C. de A.
    Ostojic, Ljerka
    Picard, Alejandra
    Platt, Michael L.
    Plotnik, Joshua M.
    Range, Friederike
    Reader, Simon M.
    Reddy, Rachna B.
    Sandel, Aaron A.
    Santos, Laurie R.
    Schumann, Katrin
    Seed, Amanda M.
    Sewall, Kendra B.
    Shaw, Rachael C.
    Slocombe, Katie E.
    Su, Yanjie
    Takimoto, Ayaka
    Tan, Jingzhi
    Tao, Ruoting
    van Schaik, Carel P.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (20) : E2140 - E2148
  • [27] The role of domestication and experience in 'looking back' towards humans in an unsolvable task
    Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
    Rao, Akshay
    Virayi, Zsoia
    Range, Friederike
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [28] The Effect of Domestication on Inhibitory Control: Wolves and Dogs Compared
    Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
    Viranyi, Zsofia
    Range, Friederike
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [29] Starving honeybees lose self-control
    Mayack, Christopher
    Naug, Dhruba
    [J]. BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 11 (01)
  • [30] A simple reason for a big difference:: Wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do
    Miklósi, A
    Kubinyi, E
    Topál, J
    Gácsi, M
    Virányi, Z
    Csányi, V
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (09) : 763 - 766