Molecular Characterization of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Accessions under Drought Stress

被引:12
|
作者
Makhadmeh, Ibrahim [1 ]
Albalasmeh, Ammar A. [2 ]
Ali, Mohammed [3 ]
Thabet, Samar G. [4 ]
Darabseh, Walaa Ali [1 ]
Jaradat, Saied [5 ]
Alqudah, Ahmad M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Plant Prod, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[2] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Agr, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[3] Egyptian Deserts Gene Bank, Dept Genet Resources, Desert Res Ctr, Cairo 11753, Egypt
[4] Univ Fayoum, Fac Sci, Dept Bot, Al Fayyum 63514, Egypt
[5] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Princess Haya Biotechnol Ctr, Irbid 22110, Jordan
[6] Aarhus Univ Flakkebjerg, Dept Agroecol, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
关键词
tomato; SSRs; breeding; gene-associated SSRs; genetic diversity; drought stress; REPEAT SSR MARKERS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; TOLERANCE; SEQUENCE; TRAITS; GROWTH; VARIETIES; PROTEIN; MICROSATELLITES; THIOREDOXINS;
D O I
10.3390/horticulturae8070600
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Exploring the genetic diversity among plant accessions is important for conserving and managing plant genetic resources. In the current study, a collection of forty-six tomato accessions from Jordan were evaluated based on their performance and their morpho-physiological, in addition to molecularly characterizing to detect genetic diversity. Tomato accessions seedlings were exposed to drought stress with 70% field capacity and 40% field capacity under field conditions in Jordan. Drought stress had significantly negatively influenced the dry root weight, fresh root weight, root growth rate, fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, and shoot growth rate. Moreover, proline content showed a highly significant increase of 304.2% in response to drought stress. The analysis of twenty morphological characters revealed a wide range of variations among tomato accessions. Accessions were screened with fourteen SSR primers; six primers were informative to explain the genetic diversity. Based on resolving power, primers LEct004 and LEat018 were most significant with all 46 accessions. Interestingly, polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.00 (Asr2 marker) to 0.499 (LEct004), which confirms that the SSR markers are highly informative. Our findings provide new insights into using informative molecular markers to elucidate such wide genetic variation discovered in our collections from Afraa and Abeel (the southern part of Jordan). Interestingly, the SSR markers were associated with genes, e.g., LEat018 with ACTIN_RELATED PROTEIN gene, the LEct004 with the HOMEOBOX PROTEIN TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS gene, and Asr2 with ABA/WDS. Moreover, the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR8 gene was associated with the LEta014 SSR marker and the LEta020 with the THIOREDOXIN FAMILY TRP26 gene. Therefore, the genetic diversity analysis and functional annotations of the genes associated with SSR information obtained in this study provide valuable information about the most suitable genotype that can be implemented in plant breeding programs and future molecular analysis. Furthermore, evaluating the performance of the collection under different water regimes is essential to produce new tomato varieties coping with drought stress conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Rachele Tamburino
    Monica Vitale
    Alessandra Ruggiero
    Mauro Sassi
    Lorenza Sannino
    Simona Arena
    Antonello Costa
    Giorgia Batelli
    Nicola Zambrano
    Andrea Scaloni
    Stefania Grillo
    Nunzia Scotti
    BMC Plant Biology, 17
  • [2] Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Tamburino, Rachele
    Vitale, Monica
    Ruggiero, Alessandra
    Sassi, Mauro
    Sannino, Lorenza
    Arena, Simona
    Costa, Antonello
    Batelli, Giorgia
    Zambrano, Nicola
    Scaloni, Andrea
    Grillo, Stefania
    Scotti, Nunzia
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [3] THE EFFECT OF FOLIAR CALCIUM APPLICATION IN TOMATO (Solanum lycopersicum L.) UNDER DROUGHT STRESS IN GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS
    Birgin, O.
    Akhoundnejad, Y.
    Dasgan, H. Y.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 19 (04): : 2971 - 2982
  • [4] Leaf Proteome Response to Drought Stress and Antioxidant Potential in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Rai, Gyanendra Kumar
    Parveen, Abida
    Jamwal, Gayatri
    Basu, Umer
    Kumar, Ranjeet Ranjan
    Rai, Pradeep K.
    Sharma, Jag Paul
    Alalawy, Adel, I
    Al-Duais, Mohammed A.
    Hossain, Mohammad Anwar
    Rahman, Muhammad Habib Ur
    Raza, Ali
    Danish, Subhan
    Sakran, Mohamed, I
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (08)
  • [5] Drought stress amelioration in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings by biostimulant as regenerative agent
    Turan, Metin
    Ekinci, Melek
    Argin, Sanem
    Brinza, Mihail
    Yildirim, Ertan
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [6] An overview of heat stress in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Alsamir, Muhammed
    Mahmood, Tariq
    Trethowan, Richard
    Ahmad, Nabil
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (03) : 1654 - 1663
  • [7] The Antioxidant Defense System of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Varieties under Drought Stress and upon Post-Drought Rewatering
    Niyazova, Naima N.
    Huseynova, Irada M.
    BIOCHEMISTRY-MOSCOW, 2024, 89 (06) : 1146 - 1157
  • [8] Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the remorin genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
    Li, Hui
    Wang, Xiao
    Zhuo, Yue
    Chen, Shuisen
    Lin, Jingwei
    Ma, Hui
    Zhong, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [9] Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) accessions and species
    Mahmoud, Ahmed M. A.
    Ebadah, Ibrahim M. A.
    Moawad, Sawsan S.
    Mahmoud, Youssef A.
    Abd El-Hameid, Asmaa R.
    Sadek, Hanaa E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2022,
  • [10] Retraction Note to: Screening and differential physiological responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to drought stress
    Rowland M. Kamanga
    Plant Physiology Reports, 2021, 26 : 581 - 581