The Role of Economic Diversification in Forest Ecosystem Management

被引:31
作者
Knoke, Thomas [1 ]
Messerer, Katharina [1 ]
Paul, Carola [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Forest Management, TUM Sch Life Sci Weihenstephan, Dept Ecol & Ecosyst Management, Hans Carl von Carlowitz Pl 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Portfolio analysis; Land use; Marginal economic return; Time diversification; Ecosystem services; Multifunctional forestry; Uncertainty; NEAR-NATURAL FORESTRY; AGRICULTURAL LAND-USE; NORWAY SPRUCE; EUROPEAN BEECH; RISK; STANDS; TIMBER; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40725-017-0054-3
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review We give an overview of economic drivers and consequences of diversification in forest management. Starting with formal portfolio-theory analyses of the optimal forest composition, we review other, often-disregarded factors that influence diversification. A special focus of our review is the interrelation between economic diversification and multifunctionality, asking if optimal economic diversification supports increased levels of multiple ecosystem services as a positive externality. Recent Findings Analyses considering economic diversification in forest management mainly build on Markowitz' theory of portfolio selection, which is essentially a statistical theory. They emphasize that the economic diversification of forest composition, regeneration and/or thinning strategies, quality of timber logs, or age classes can significantly reduce risks. Further studies assume that risk-averse landowners will provide benefits for the society as a by-product of their management strategies, because economic diversification is usually associated with enhanced biodiversity and higher levels of multiple ecosystem services. Summary We identify drivers and consequences of economic diversification that have been seldom addressed in previous studies. These include the aim to achieve subsistence, to balance site-dependent marginal economic return among various stand types, to utilize synergistic effects between mixed tree species and to achieve averaging effects over time (time diversification). Another important factor influencing and influenced by diversification is multifunctionality, because economic diversification alone does not necessarily automatically provide a larger range of uncertain ecosystem services. Consequently, future research could extend classical portfolio approaches to multi-objective, robust optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 106
页数:14
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Abson D.J., 2013, AGR FOOD SECURITY, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-2-2
[2]   Optimal portfolio design to reduce climate-related conservation uncertainty in the Prairie Pothole Region [J].
Ando, Amy W. ;
Mallory, Mindy L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (17) :6484-6489
[3]  
[Anonymous], RISK ANAL FOREST MAN
[4]   Building deployment portfolios for genotypes under performance instability [J].
Apiolaza, Luis A. ;
Alzamora, Rosa M. .
SILVA FENNICA, 2013, 47 (01)
[5]   Explaining determinants of the on-farm diversification: empirical evidence from Tuscany region [J].
Bartolini, Fabio ;
Andreoli, Maria ;
Brunori, Gianluca .
BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 3 (02) :137-157
[6]   Managing increasing environmental risks through agrobiodiversity and agrienvironmental policies [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (05) :483-496
[7]  
BEINHOFER B, 2009, ANWENDUNG PORTFOLIOT
[8]   Comparing the financial performance of traditionally managed beech and oak stands with roomy established and pruned stands [J].
Beinhofer, Bernhard .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2010, 129 (02) :175-187
[9]   Conservation payments under risk:: A stochastic dominance approach [J].
Benítez, PC ;
Kuosmanen, T ;
Olschewski, R ;
van Kooten, GC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (01) :1-15
[10]  
BenTal A, 2009, PRINC SER APPL MATH, P1