Location of Agricultural Drainage Pipes and Assessment of Agricultural Drainage Pipe Conditions Using Ground Penetrating Radar

被引:34
作者
Allred, Barry J. [1 ]
Redman, J. David [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Soil Drainage Res Unit, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Sensors & Software Inc, Mississauga, ON L4W 2X8, Canada
关键词
GEOPHYSICAL METHODS; WATER-CONTENT;
D O I
10.2113/JEEG15.3.119
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Methods are needed to not only locate buried agricultural drainage pipe, but to also determine if the pipes are functioning properly with respect to water delivery. The primary focus of this research project was to confirm the ability of ground penetrating radar (GPR) to locate buried drainage pipe, and then determine if GPR provides insight into drain line water conveyance functionality. Ground penetrating radar surveys using 250 MHz transmitter/receiver antennas were conducted at a specially designed test plot under drained, moderately wet soil conditions (water table below drain lines) and undrained, extremely wet soil conditions (water table above drain lines). The test plot contained four drain lines: one a clay tile to corrugated plastic tubing (CPT) drain line that was completely open to flow; one comprised of CPT with an isolated obstruction near the midpoint, completely preventing through-flow of water; one comprised of CPT but filled with soil; and one comprised of CPT but severed near its midpoint, producing a partial obstruction to water flow. Subsequent GPR computer modeling simulations were employed to assist with interpretation of the GPR field data. Results of the GPR field surveys indicate that given suitable shallow hydrologic conditions. GPR not only finds drainage pipes, but can also determine the position along a drain line where there: is an isolated obstruction that completely blocks water flow. However, results show that a partial pipe obstruction is difficult to locate using GPR. Surprisingly, the soil-filled drain line was clearly detectable under both soil hydrologic conditions tested. The GPR computer modeling simulations indicate that soil had likely settled within the pipe, and that the GPR responses obtained at the test plot for the soil-filled pipe were responses representative of a pipe that was in fact only partially filled with soil. Overall, these research results provide valuable information for those contemplating the use of GPR to locate agricultural drainage pipes and then determine their functionality.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 134
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Allred BJ, 2005, APPL ENG AGRIC, V21, P71
[2]   Golf course applications of near-surface geophysical methods: A case study [J].
Allred, BJ ;
Redman, JD ;
McCoy, EL ;
Taylor, RS .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING GEOPHYSICS, 2005, 10 (01) :1-19
[3]  
Allred BJ, 2004, APPL ENG AGRIC, V20, P307
[4]   Mapping golf green drainage systems and subsurface features using ground penetrating radar [J].
Boniak, R ;
Chong, SK ;
Indorante, SJ ;
Doolittle, JA .
GPR 2002: NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR, 2002, 4758 :477-481
[5]   IDENTIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR [J].
CHOW, TL ;
REES, HW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1989, 69 (02) :223-234
[6]  
Conyers LawrenceB., 1997, Ground Penetrating Radar
[7]  
Conyers LawrenceB., 2004, Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology
[8]  
GIANNOPOULOS A, 2009, GPRMAX GROUND PENETR
[9]   Field-scale estimation of volumetric water content using ground-penetrating radar ground wave techniques [J].
Grote, K ;
Hubbard, S ;
Rubin, Y .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (11) :SBH51-SBH513
[10]   Radar imaging of underground pipes by automated estimation of velocity distribution versus depth [J].
Hayakawa, H ;
Kawanaka, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1998, 40 (1-3) :37-48