Students' Growth Mindsets, Goals, and Academic Outcomes in Mathematics

被引:39
作者
Bostwick, Keiko C. P. [1 ]
Collie, Rebecca J. [1 ]
Martin, Andrew J. [1 ]
Durksen, Tracy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Educ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY | 2017年 / 225卷 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
growth mindset; growth goals; academic engagement; academic achievement; mathematics; OF-FIT INDEXES; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; IMPLICIT THEORIES; ENGAGEMENT; INTELLIGENCE; MOTIVATION; PB; MEDIATION; PREDICT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1027/2151-2604/a000287
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The majority of educational research on the associations between growth constructs and academic outcomes has adopted a somewhat piecemeal approach, focusing on either growth mindset (implicit beliefs about intelligence) or growth goals. We explore an integrative approach to analyzing the impact of well-established and emerging growth constructs (viz. growth mindset, self-based growth goals, task-based growth goals) on academic outcomes in mathematics. Our participants were secondary school students (n = 4,411) in grades 7-9 from 19 schools in Australia. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the measurement and substantive hypotheses in our study. We found that growth mindset, self-based growth goals, and task-based growth goals were well represented by an underlying growth orientation factor. Additionally, after controlling for five student background factors (e.g., sex, socioeconomic status [SES]), students' growth orientation positively predicted mathematics engagement and achievement. These results contribute to the growing literature on educational growth constructs and academic success.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Switching On and Switching Off in Mathematics: An Ecological Study of Future Intent and Disengagement Among Middle School Students [J].
Martin, Andrew J. ;
Anderson, Judy ;
Bobis, Janette ;
Way, Jennifer ;
Vellar, Rosemary .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 104 (01) :1-18
[32]   CHOOSING A MULTIVARIATE MODEL - NONCENTRALITY AND GOODNESS OF FIT [J].
MCDONALD, RP ;
MARSH, HW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1990, 107 (02) :247-255
[33]  
Muthen L.K., 2016, MPLUS USERS GUIDE, VSeventh
[34]  
OECD, 2013, ED GLANC 2013 OECD I, DOI [DOI 10.1787/EAG-2018-EN, 10.1787/eag-2013-en, DOI 10.1787/EAG-2013-EN]
[35]   Evaluation of Scale Reliability With Binary Measures Using Latent Variable Modeling [J].
Raykov, Tenko ;
Dimitrov, Dimiter M. ;
Asparouhov, Tihomir .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2010, 17 (02) :265-279
[36]  
Senko C, 2016, EDUC PSYCHOL HANDB, P75
[37]   Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Shrout, PE ;
Bolger, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :422-445
[38]   The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science [J].
Sinatra, Gale M. ;
Heddy, Benjamin C. ;
Lombardi, Doug .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 50 (01) :1-13
[39]   The role of implicit theories of intelligence and ability in predicting achievement for Indigenous (Aboriginal) Australian students [J].
Tarbetsky, Ana L. ;
Collie, Rebecca J. ;
Martin, Andrew J. .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 47 :61-71
[40]   Personal best (PB) and 'classic' achievement goals in the Chinese context: their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy [J].
Yu, Kai ;
Martin, Andrew J. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 34 (05) :635-658