The 2019 Ridgecrest, California earthquake sequence: Evolution of seismic and aseismic slip on an orthogonal fault system

Cascade-up and/or slow-slip processes are commonly believed to control interactions between foreshocks, mainshocks and aftershocks, but their relative contributions remain poorly resolved. Discrimination between these processes will shed light on the understanding of earthquake physics, which requires exceptional observations of earthquake sequences. The well-recorded July 2019 Ridgecrest, California foreshock-mainshock-aftershock earthquake sequence provides such an opportunity. We perform simultaneous inversion of the July 4th M-W 6.4 foreshock and July 5th M-W 7.1 mainshock kinematic rupture models using SAR, strong motion, and GPS data. We also invert for afterslip models following the M-W 6.4 foreshock and the mainshock, respectively, by developing an inversion method that utilizes strainmeter, SAR and daily GPS time series. The inversion results show that the overall sequence involves no less than six fault segments, which include a main northwest-trending fault and secondary faults with sub-parallel and orthogonal geometry to the main fault. Co-seismic slip and afterslip have complementary patterns on the faults. During the early post-seismic period following the M-W 6.4 foreshock and the mainshock, moment release on the southwest-trending fault is dominated by aseismic slip, in contrast to the predominantly seismic slip on the northwest-trending fault. The mainshock appears to be triggered by a cascade migration of foreshocks on a northwest-trending fault. Slip on the southwest-trending fault migrates from the fault junction at the northeast end (following the M-W 6.4 foreshock) to the southwest end (following the mainshock) during the afterslip interval. The dual-mode (seismic versus aseismic) slip phenomena appear to be driven by co-seismic stress changes produced by the major events. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.