Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

被引:45
作者
Bush, N [1 ]
Donaldson, G
Moinpour, C
Haberman, M
Milliken, D
Markle, V
Lauson, J
机构
[1] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] SW Oncol Grp, Ctr Stat, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Washington State Univ, Coll Nursing, Spokane, WA USA
关键词
bone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; computers; data collection; feasibility studies; internet; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-004-2394-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We believe that many adverse events following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), particularly relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease (CGVHD), are preceded by a subclinical period of development that is accessible by frequent psychometric assessment. Documenting these associations could improve future clinical care by extending the potential window for intervention. However, conventional methods of assessing quantity of lite (QOL) in patients in their homes, typically by mailed self-assessment questionnaires, are impractical for very frequent administration. We have developed and implemented a web-based system for measuring short-term (dynamic) changes in QOL by employing brief, online, daily QOL assessments and more extensive, monthly online assessments from patients' homes. Here we report the feasibility of collecting very frequent patient home self-assessments of QOL via the web for a 52 week participation period; we detail incidence of home web access, accrual, compliance, and satisfaction with the system in an HSCT patient sample. We also describe our integrated web-systems for administering patient recruitment, scheduling, monitoring, and analysis. Our results suggest that very frequent routine collection of QOL outcomes is entirely feasible using our web-based home assessment tool, with good patient compliance and high user satisfaction. We believe our methodology shows great promise for use with other cancer and health populations.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 93
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Stockler M.R., Osoba D., Corey P., Goodwin P.J., Tannock I.F., Convergent discriminitive, and predictive validity of the Prostate Cancer Specific Quality of Life Instrument (PROSQOLI) assessment and comparison with analogous scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and a trial-specific module. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, pp. 653-666, (1999)
[22]  
Chang V.T., Thaler H.T., Polyak T.A., Kornblith A.B., Lepore J.M., Portenoy R.K., Quality of life and survival: The role of multidimensional symptom assessment, Cancer, 83, pp. 173-179, (1998)
[23]  
Geyer Jr. C.E., Green S.J., Moinpour C.M., Et al., Expanded phase II trial of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group study, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 51, pp. 169-181, (1998)
[24]  
Schoffski P., Schelenberger U., Kohne C.-H., Et al., Quality of life predicts for both response and survival in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized Phase II study, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 15, (1996)
[25]  
Bush N., Donaldson G., Moinpour C., Quality of Life measures as leading indicators of adverse clinical events after bone marrow and stem cell transplantation, Clin Therap, 24 B, SUPPL., pp. 9-11, (2002)
[26]  
Fayers P., MRC quality of life studies using a daily diary card - Practical lessons learned from cancer trials, Qual Life Res, 4, pp. 343-352, (1995)
[27]  
Aaronson N.K., Bakker W., Stewart A.L., Van Dam F.S.A.M., Van Zandwijk N., Yarnold J.R., Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials, The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients, (1987)
[28]  
Berry D.L., Moinpour C., Blumenstein B.A., Thrasher J.B., Ellis W.J., Measurement of irritative bladder symptoms, Oncol Nurs Forum, 24, (1997)
[29]  
Pater J., Osoba D., Zee B., Et al., Effects of altering the time of administration and the time frame of quality of life assessments in clinical trials: An example using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a large anti-emetic trial, Qual Life Res, 7, pp. 273-278, (1998)
[30]  
Kooiker S.E., Exploring the iceberg of morbidity: A comparison of different survey methods for assessing the occurrence of everyday illness, Soc Sci Med, 41, pp. 317-332, (1995)