Entry Deterrence and Collusion at Repeated Multiunit Auctions of ITQs

被引:1
作者
Pena-Torres, Julio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Munoz, Roberto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Quezada, Felipe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Clapes UC, Ave Lihertador Bernardo OHiggins 440,Piso 13, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Ingn Comercial, Ave Santa Maria 6400, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Inst Marine Sci, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
关键词
Auctioning production (ITQ) rights; Chilean sea bass fishery; collusive bidding; English and Dutch auctions; entry deterrence; sequential multiunit auctions; COMPETITION; FISHERIES; MARKET; QUOTA; INFORMATION; SPECTRUM; RIGHTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1086/721014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study revenue, entry, and possible collusion outcomes in the Chilean fishery with the longest record of individual transferable share quotas allocated via public auctions. We examine 18 annual multi-object auctions and two different auction designs at work. Based on results from a numerically calibrated auction model and econometric estimates, we claim that the repeated use of sequential oral (multiunit) auctions was particularly prone to bid rigging and facilitated entry deterrence. Yet, efficient entry was possible thanks to fully transferable quota rights. We highlight two conclusions from these results: First, when selling multiple production rights in a highly concentrated industry repeatedly over time, auctioneers should avoid using sequential, English auctions. Second, transferable production rights help overcome inefficiencies that can arise from design flaws in the chosen mechanism for allocating these rights.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 465
页数:29
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Efficiency Advantages of Grandfathering in Rights-Based Fisheries Management [J].
Anderson, Terry ;
Arnason, Ragnar ;
Libecap, Gary D. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 3, 2011, 3 :159-179
[2]   Fish quota auctions in the Russian far east: a failed experiment [J].
Anferova, E ;
Vetemaa, M ;
Hannesson, R .
MARINE POLICY, 2005, 29 (01) :47-56
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, RGK1350 IDB
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ANALISIS CLUSTER BUQ
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, AUCTIONS THEORY PRAC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PUTTING AUCTION THEO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, I139 U ALB HURT
[8]   Testing for collusion in asymmetric first-price auctions [J].
Aryal, Gaurab ;
Gabrielli, Maria F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2013, 31 (01) :26-35
[9]   HOW AUCTIONS WORK FOR WINE AND ART [J].
ASHENFELTER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1989, 3 (03) :23-36
[10]   A Study of the Internal Organization of a Bidding Cartel [J].
Asker, John .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (03) :724-762