The trouble with stock options

被引:345
作者
Hall, BJ [1 ]
Murphy, KJ
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Business, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Business Adm, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/089533003769204353
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The benefits of stock options are often not large enough to offset the inefficiency implied by the large divergence between the cost of options to companies and the value of options to risk-averse, undiversified executives and employees. Moreover, the benefits of options can often be achieved more effectively and economically through other means. Why are options so prevalent? Several explanations include changes in corporate governance, reporting requirements, taxes, the bull market and managerial rent-seeking. We offer an alternative hypothesis: boards and managers incorrectly perceive stock options to be inexpensive because options create no accounting charge and require no cash outlay.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 70
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Market valuation of employee stock options [J].
Aboody, D .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1996, 22 (1-3) :357-391
[2]  
ABOODY D, 2001, SFAS 123 STOCK BASED
[3]  
AMIR E, 1993, ACCOUNT REV, V68, P703
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NEW YORKER
[5]   Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JM ;
Walker, DI .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) :751-846
[6]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[7]  
CARTER ME, 2003, IN PRESS J ACCOUNTIN
[8]   Stock option plans for non-executive employees [J].
Core, JE ;
Guay, WR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 61 (02) :253-287
[9]   IMPACT ON EQUITY PRICES OF PRONOUNCEMENTS RELATED TO NONPENSION POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS [J].
ESPAHBODI, H ;
STROCK, E ;
TEHRANIAN, H .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1991, 14 (04) :323-346
[10]  
FEE E, 2003, IN PRESS REV FINANCI