A proposed method for linear accelerator photon beam steering using EPID

被引:7
作者
Barnes, Michael P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Menk, Frederick W. [3 ]
Lamichhane, Bishnu P. [3 ]
Greer, Peter B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Mater Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med Radiat Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2018年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
beam steering; EPID; machine performance check (MPC); pixel sensitivity matrix (PSM); DOSIMETRY; AAPM; QA;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12419
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Beam steering is the process of calibrating the angle and translational position with which a linear accelerator's (linac's) electron beam strikes the x-ray target with respect to the collimator rotation axis. The shape of the dose profile is highly dependent on accurate beam steering and is essential for ensuring correct delivery of the radiotherapy treatment plan. Traditional methods of beam steering utilize a scanning water tank phantom that makes the process user-dependent This study is the first to provide a methodology for both beam angle steering and beam translational position steering based on EPID imaging of the beam and does not require a phantom. Both the EPID-based beam angle steering and beam translational steering methods described have been validated against IC Profiler measurement. Wide field symmetry agreement was found between the EPID and IC Profiler to within 0.06 +/- 0.14% (1 SD) and 0.32 +/- 0.11% (1 SD) for flattened and flatteningfilter-free (FFF) beams, respectively. For a 1.1% change in symmetry measured by IC Profiler the EPID method agreed to within 0.23%. For beam translational position steering, the EPID method agreed with IC Profiler method to within 0.03 +/- 0.05 mm (1 SD) at isocenter. The EPID-based methods presented are quick to perform, simple, accurate and could easily be integrated with the linac, potentially via the MPC application. The methods have the potential to remove user variability and to standardize the process of beam steering throughout the radiotherapy community.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 597
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PHYS RADIOTHERAPY X
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, 60976 IEC
  • [3] Barnes MP, 2016, JACMP, V18, P139
  • [4] Bin Cai S, 2017, JACMP, V19, P73
  • [5] Daily monitoring of linear accelerator beam parameters using an amorphous silicon EPID
    Budgell, G. J.
    Zhang, R.
    Mackay, R. I.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (06) : 1721 - 1733
  • [6] IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy
    Budgell, Geoff
    Brown, Kirstie
    Cashmore, Jason
    Duane, Simon
    Frame, John
    Hardy, Mark
    Paynter, David
    Thomas, Russell
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (23) : 8360 - 8394
  • [7] Beam focal spot position: The forgotten linac QA parameter. An EPID-based phantomless method for routine Stereotactic linac QA
    Chojnowski, Jacek M.
    Barnes, Michael P.
    Sykes, Jonathan R.
    Thwaites, David I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 178 - 183
  • [8] Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM
    Das, Indra J.
    Cheng, Chee-Wai
    Watts, Ronald J.
    Ahnesjo, Anders
    Gibbons, John
    Li, X. Allen
    Lowenstein, Jessica
    Mitra, Raj K.
    Simon, William E.
    Zhu, Timothy C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) : 4186 - 4215
  • [9] Quantification of beam steering with an ionization chamber array
    Gao, Song
    Balter, Peter A.
    Tran, Benjamin
    Rose, Mark
    Simon, William E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03): : 168 - 176
  • [10] Correction of pixel sensitivity variation and off-axis response for amorphous silicon EPID dosimetry
    Greer, PB
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) : 3558 - 3568