Direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists after TAVR: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Several patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) also require oral anti-coagulation (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) or deep vein thromboembolism. However, the optimal type of OAC strategy (direct oral anticoagulants, DOACs, or vitamin K antagonists, VKA) is still unclear in this setting.Method: We performed systematic literature research and meta-analysis in PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE da-tabases for studies reporting either all-cause mortality, major/life-threatening bleeding or stroke events.Results: Ten observational studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including a total of 29,485 pa-tients were eligible for inclusion. Compared to VKA, DOACs use after TAVR was associated with a modest but significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality (RR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-0.99, p-value 0.04) with results mainly driven by observational studies. Cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.81-1.30; p-value 0.84), total stroke events (RR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.23, p-value 0.79), major/life-threatening bleeding (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.72-1.21, p-value 0.61) and minor bleeding (RR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.74-1.23; p-value 0.72) were similar between VKA and DOACs.Conclusion: Considering the totality of available evidence, in patients who underwent TAVR with a concomitant indication for OAC, DOACs-based strategy is an effective and safe anticoagulation strategy compared to VKA.