Inmate exposure to secondhand smoke in correctional facilities and the impact of smoking restrictions

被引:29
作者
Hammond, SK
Emmons, KM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2005年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
secondhand smoke; prisons; correctional facilities; smoking policy;
D O I
10.1038/sj.jea.7500387
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study was undertaken to measure the passive smoking exposure of prisoners at three correctional facilities in the US and to evaluate the effectiveness of a ban on smoking in reducing these exposures at two of these facilities. The average weekly concentration of nicotine was measured in fixed locations within the correctional facilities using passive samplers. Samples were collected before and after a smoking ban was instituted, and after the policy was modified to allow smoking outdoors. Samples were collected in the living areas, near where inmates slept and watched TV, and in selected central facilities, including dining halls, visiting rooms, booking areas, and learning centers. Average weekly concentrations of nicotine were measured in 84 locations while smoking was allowed; changes in these concentrations were measured with 112 weekly samples 4 and 9 months after the policy restricting smoking was implemented The average concentrations of nicotine were high while smoking was allowed: most living and sleeping areas averaged 3-11 mu g/m(3), but the gym that was used as a bunkroom averaged 25 mu g/m(3); these values compare to an average of 2 mu g/m(3) in the homes of smokers. The smoking ban significantly reduced nicotine concentrations in the living areas ( P < 0.01 at facility A and P < 0.05 at facility B) to averages of 1.5-2.2 mu g/m(3); all postban samples were less than 5 mu g/m(3). In conclusion, secondhand smoke concentrations in correctional facilities can be quite high; however, policies banning smoking are effective in reducing, but not eliminating, these exposures.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 211
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, IARC MON
[2]  
BELKIN L, 1990, NY TIMES, pA10
[3]   Passive smoking as well as active smoking increases the risk of acute stroke [J].
Bonita, R ;
Duncan, J ;
Truelsen, T ;
Jackson, RT ;
Beaglehole, R .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 1999, 8 (02) :156-160
[4]  
*BUR NAT AFF INC, 1987, THER SMOK PROBL POL
[5]  
*CA EPA, 1997, HLTH EFF EXP ENV TOB
[6]   AN INTERCOMPARISON OF SAMPLING TECHNIQUES FOR NICOTINE IN INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS [J].
CAKA, FM ;
EATOUGH, DJ ;
LEWIS, EA ;
TANG, HM ;
HAMMOND, SK ;
LEADERER, BP ;
KOUTRAKIS, P ;
SPENGLER, JD ;
FASANO, A ;
MCCARTHY, J ;
OGDEN, MW ;
LEWTAS, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 24 (08) :1196-1203
[7]   Smoking in correctional facilities: a survey of employees [J].
Carpenter, MJ ;
Hughes, JR ;
Solomon, LJ ;
Powell, TA .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2001, 10 (01) :38-42
[8]   DEVELOPMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC TOOLS FOR MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE EXPOSURE [J].
COGHLIN, J ;
HAMMOND, SK ;
GANN, PH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 130 (04) :696-704
[9]   Tracers for assessing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: What are they tracing? [J].
Daisey, JM .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1999, 107 :319-327
[10]   SMOKING AT HOME - THE IMPACT OF SMOKING CESSATION ON NONSMOKERS EXPOSURE TO ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE [J].
EMMONS, KM ;
HAMMOND, SK ;
ABRAMS, DB .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 13 (06) :516-520