Life cycle assessment study on polishing units for use of treated wastewater in agricultural reuse

被引:11
|
作者
Buyukkamaci, Nurdan [1 ]
Karaca, Gokce [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Environm Engn, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Grad Sch Nat & Appl Sci, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
agricultural reuse; environmental impact; LCA; membrane; UV; OZONE CREATION POTENTIALS; TREATMENT-PLANT; ELECTRICITY; GAS;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2017.474
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used in the assessment of environmental impacts of some polishing units for reuse of wastewater treatment plant effluents in agricultural irrigation. These alternative polishing units were assessed: (1) microfiltration and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection, (2) cartridge filter and ultrafiltration (UF), and (3) just UV disinfection. Two different energy sources, electric grid mix and natural gas, were considered to assess the environmental impacts of them. Afterwards, the effluent of each case was evaluated against the criteria required for irrigation of sensitive crops corresponding to Turkey regulations. Evaluation of environmental impacts was carried out with GaBi 6.1 LCA software. The overall conclusion of this study is that higher electricity consumption causes higher environmental effects. The results of the study revealed that cartridge filter and UF in combination with electric grid mix has the largest impact on the environment for almost all impact categories. In general, the most environmentally friendly solution is UV disinfection. The study revealed environmental impacts for three alternatives drawing attention to the importance of the choice of the most appropriate polishing processes and energy sources for reuse applications.
引用
收藏
页码:3205 / 3212
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in developing countries: A review
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon
    WATER RESEARCH, 2019, 153 : 63 - 79
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment of Agricultural Wood Production-Methodological Options: a Literature Review
    Perdomo E., E. Alejandro
    Schwarzbauer, Peter
    Fuertner, Daniela
    Hesser, Franziska
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (02) : 492 - 509
  • [33] Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: State of the art
    Corominas, Ll.
    Foley, J.
    Guest, J. S.
    Hospido, A.
    Larsen, H. F.
    Morera, S.
    Shaw, A.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2013, 47 (15) : 5480 - 5492
  • [34] Life cycle assessment of cucumber irrigation: unplanned water reuse versus groundwater resources in Tipaza (Algeria)
    Azeb, Latifa
    Hartani, Tarik
    Aitmouheb, Nassim
    Pradeleix, Ludivine
    Hajjaji, Nouredddin
    Aribi, Soumaya
    JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, 2020, 10 (03): : 227 - 238
  • [35] Holistic life cycle assessment of water reuse in a tourist-based community
    Santana, Mark V. E.
    Cornejo, Pablo K.
    Rodriguez-Roda, Ignasi
    Buttiglieri, Gianluigi
    Corominas, Lluis
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 743 - 752
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina
    Morero, Betzabet
    Groppelli, Eduardo
    Campanella, Enrique A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 182 : 208 - 216
  • [37] The Use of Life Cycle Techniques in the Assessment of Sustainability
    Gundes, Selin
    URBAN PLANNING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (UPADSD), 2016, 216 : 916 - 922
  • [38] Life cycle assessment applications to reuse, recycling and circular practices for textiles: A review
    Abagnato, Samuele
    Rigamonti, Lucia
    Grosso, Mario
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 182 : 74 - 90
  • [39] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Urban Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Case Study for Iran
    Saeedeh Shoaeeposhteh
    Freydoon Vafaie
    Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 2025, 10 (2)
  • [40] Sustainability of insect use for feed and food: Life Cycle Assessment perspective
    Smetana, Sergiy
    Palanisamy, Megala
    Mathys, Alexander
    Heinz, Volker
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 741 - 751