Comparison of the anaesthetic requirement with target-controlled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal tube vs. the laryngeal mask

被引:14
|
作者
Richebe, P
Rivalan, B
Baudouin, L
Sesay, M
Sztark, F
Cros, AM
Maurette, P
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Anesthesie & Reanimat 1, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Anesthesie & Reanimat 4, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
关键词
laryngeal mask; propofol; anaesthesia intravenous;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021505001456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The target effect-site concentration of propofol to Insert a laryngeal mask airway was recently reported as almost 5 mu g mL(-1). The present study aimed to determine the target effect-site concentration with target-controlled infusion of propofol to place classical larnygeal mask airway or current laryngeal tube in adult patients. Methods: We included 40 patients scheduled for short gynaecological and radiological procedures under general anaesthesia in a randomized, double-blind manner using the Dixon's up-and-down statistical method. Monitoring included standard cardiorespiratory monitors, and bispectral index monitoring was used for all patients. Anaesthesia was conducted with a target-controlled infusion system: Diprifusor (TM). The initial target plasma concentration of propofol was 5 mu g mL(-1), and was changed stepwise by 0.5 mu g mL(-1) increments according to Dixon's up-and-down method. Criteria for acceptable insertion were: Muzi's score <= 2, and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate or bispectral index variation < 20% the baseline values. Results: Target effect-site concentration of propofol required to insert laryngeal tube was 6.3 +/- 0.3 mu g mL(-1) with Dixon method and ED50 was 6.1 mu g mL(-1) (5.9-6.4) with logistic regression method. In the case of larnygeal mask airway they were 7.3 +/- 0.2 mu g mL(-1) (Dixon method) and 7.3 mu g mL(-1) (7.1-7.5; with logistic regression) respectively (P < 0.05). ED95 (logistic regression) was 6.8 mu g mL(-1) (5.9-7.6) for laryngeal tube and 7.7 mu g mL(-1) (7.3-8.0) for larnygeal mask airway (P < 0.05). Haemodynamic incidents were 55% in the larnygeal mask airway group vs. 30% in the laryngeal tube group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The target effect-site concentration of propofol for insertion of laryngeal tube was lower than for larnygeal mask airway (P < 0.05), with a consequent reduction of the propofol induced haemodynamic side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] IV ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL USING A TARGET-CONTROLLED INFUSION SYSTEM - COMPARISON WITH INHALATION ANESTHESIA FOR GENERAL SURGICAL-PROCEDURES IN CHILDREN
    DOYLE, E
    MCFADZEAN, W
    MORTON, NS
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 70 (05) : 542 - 545
  • [42] A comparison of the effects of two different doses of ketamine used for co-induction of anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs
    Mair, Alastair R.
    Pawson, Patricia
    Courcier, Emily
    Flaherty, Derek
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 36 (06) : 532 - 538
  • [43] Comparison of thiopentone with lidocaine spray vs propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion at tikur anbessa specialized hospital. A prospective cohort study
    Belete, Engidawork
    Yahones, Misrak W.
    Aweke, Zemedu
    Dendir, Getahun
    Mola, Simeneh
    Neme, Derartu
    Melaku, Getnet
    Ahmed, Siraj
    Regasa, Teshome
    Tesfaye, Brook
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 66
  • [44] Comparison of Effects of Thoracic Epidural and Intravenous Administration of Lidocaine on Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol and Tracheal Intubation Response During Induction of Anesthesia
    Yang, Wanchao
    Geng, Yingjie
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Aimin
    Liu, Jing
    Xing, Jingchun
    Li, Wenzhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2013, 27 (06) : 1295 - 1300
  • [45] Comparison of target concentration of propofol during three phases of live donor liver transplant surgery using a target-controlled infusion of propofol total intravenous anaesthesia - A prospective, observational pilot study
    Garg, Neha
    Kalra, Yatin
    Panwar, Shivali
    Arora, Mahesh K.
    Dhingra, Udit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (11) : 971 - 977
  • [46] Anesthetics modulate oxidative stress during one-lung ventilation in lung cancer patients: Comparison of target-controlled propofol infusion and desflurane
    Yalcin, Saban
    Ozgencil, Enver
    Serdaroglu, Hacer
    Oba, Sirali
    Enon, Serkan
    Demiralp, Sacide
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 6 (06): : 407 - 411
  • [47] Target-controlled infusion of propofol versus intermittent bolus of a sedative cocktail regimen in deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: Comparison of cardiovascular and respiratory parameters
    Chan, Wei-Hung
    Chang, Shih-Lun
    Lin, Ching-Shuan
    Chen, Mei-Jyh
    Fan, Shou-Zen
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2014, 15 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [48] Comparison of the hemodynamic response to induction and intubation during a target-controlled infusion of propofol with 2 different pharmacokinetic models. A prospective ramdomized trial
    Ramos Luengo, A.
    Asensio Merino, F.
    Castilla, M. S.
    Alonso Rodriguez, E.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2015, 62 (09): : 487 - 494
  • [49] RETRACTED: Individual titration of propofol plasma target improves anaesthetic stability in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a comparison with manually controlled infusion (Retracted article. See vol. 28, pg. 468, 2011)
    Mayer, J.
    Boldt, J.
    Triem, J. G.
    Schellhaass, A.
    Mengistu, A. M.
    Suttner, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (09) : 741 - 747