Comparison of the anaesthetic requirement with target-controlled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal tube vs. the laryngeal mask

被引:14
|
作者
Richebe, P
Rivalan, B
Baudouin, L
Sesay, M
Sztark, F
Cros, AM
Maurette, P
机构
[1] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Anesthesie & Reanimat 1, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Dept Anesthesie & Reanimat 4, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
关键词
laryngeal mask; propofol; anaesthesia intravenous;
D O I
10.1017/S0265021505001456
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and objective: The target effect-site concentration of propofol to Insert a laryngeal mask airway was recently reported as almost 5 mu g mL(-1). The present study aimed to determine the target effect-site concentration with target-controlled infusion of propofol to place classical larnygeal mask airway or current laryngeal tube in adult patients. Methods: We included 40 patients scheduled for short gynaecological and radiological procedures under general anaesthesia in a randomized, double-blind manner using the Dixon's up-and-down statistical method. Monitoring included standard cardiorespiratory monitors, and bispectral index monitoring was used for all patients. Anaesthesia was conducted with a target-controlled infusion system: Diprifusor (TM). The initial target plasma concentration of propofol was 5 mu g mL(-1), and was changed stepwise by 0.5 mu g mL(-1) increments according to Dixon's up-and-down method. Criteria for acceptable insertion were: Muzi's score <= 2, and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate or bispectral index variation < 20% the baseline values. Results: Target effect-site concentration of propofol required to insert laryngeal tube was 6.3 +/- 0.3 mu g mL(-1) with Dixon method and ED50 was 6.1 mu g mL(-1) (5.9-6.4) with logistic regression method. In the case of larnygeal mask airway they were 7.3 +/- 0.2 mu g mL(-1) (Dixon method) and 7.3 mu g mL(-1) (7.1-7.5; with logistic regression) respectively (P < 0.05). ED95 (logistic regression) was 6.8 mu g mL(-1) (5.9-7.6) for laryngeal tube and 7.7 mu g mL(-1) (7.3-8.0) for larnygeal mask airway (P < 0.05). Haemodynamic incidents were 55% in the larnygeal mask airway group vs. 30% in the laryngeal tube group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The target effect-site concentration of propofol for insertion of laryngeal tube was lower than for larnygeal mask airway (P < 0.05), with a consequent reduction of the propofol induced haemodynamic side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 863
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Requirements for target-controlled infusion of propofol to insert the laryngeal mask airway
    Taylor, IN
    Kenny, GNC
    ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 53 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [2] Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol
    Baik, HJ
    Kim, JH
    Lee, CH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2001, 13 (03) : 175 - 181
  • [3] Combination of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children
    Kim, H. -S.
    Park, H. -J.
    Kim, C. S.
    Lee, J. -R.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2011, 77 (07) : 687 - 692
  • [4] REMIFENTANIL REQUIREMENT FOR CLASSIC™, FASTRACH™ AND I-GEL™ LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION WITH TARGET-CONTROLLED PROPOFOL INFUSION
    Can, Ozlem S.
    Ozcelik, Menekse
    Guclu, Cigdem Y.
    Oztuna, Derya
    Alanoglu, Zekeriyya
    Kecik, Yuksel
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2013, 29 (04): : 639 - 646
  • [5] A Randomized Comparison of Target-Controlled Infusion of Remifentanil and Propofol with Desflurane and Fentanyl for Laryngeal Surgery
    Wang, Y.
    Yan, M.
    He, J. G.
    Zhu, Y. M.
    Hu, X. S.
    Li, X.
    Wu, W. D.
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND ITS RELATED SPECIALTIES, 2011, 73 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [6] Facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion - Effects of remifentanil administered before induction with target-controlled propofol infusion
    Grewal, K
    Samsoon, G
    ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (09) : 897 - 901
  • [7] Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion
    Handa-Tsutsui, F
    Kodaka, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2005, 17 (05) : 344 - 347
  • [8] Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion
    Baik, Hee Jung
    Kim, Youn Jin
    Kim, Jong Hak
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (05) : 377 - 381
  • [9] Comparison of dexmedetomidine-propofol vs. fentanyl-propofol for laryngeal mask insertion
    Uzuemcuegil, F.
    Canbay, O.
    Celebi, N.
    Karagoz, A. H.
    Ozgen, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (08) : 675 - 680
  • [10] Target concentration of propofol required to insert the laryngeal mask airway in children
    Viviand, X
    Berdugo, L
    De La Noé, CA
    Lando, A
    Martin, C
    PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 13 (03): : 217 - 222