Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:25
作者
Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana [1 ,2 ]
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu [3 ]
Cazacu, Irina M. [4 ]
Florescu, Lucian Mihai [5 ]
Streba, Liliana [6 ]
Croitoru, Vlad M. [4 ]
Sur, Daniel [7 ]
Croitoru, Adina [4 ]
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina [8 ]
Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil [6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol, Prof Dr Alexandru Trestioreanu, Soseaua Fundeni, Bucharest 022328, Romania
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Doctoral Sch, Bucharest 020021, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Gastroenterol, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
[4] Fundeni Clin Inst, Dept Oncol, 258 Fundeni St, Bucharest 022238, Romania
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, 2-4 Petru Rares St, Craiova 200349, Romania
[6] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Oncol, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
[7] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu, Dept Med Oncol 11, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
[8] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Pharmacoecon, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; computer-aided diagnosis; pancreatic cancer; endoscopic ultrasound; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; EUS IMAGES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ADENOCARCINOMA; UTILITY; CNN; CT;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020309
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I-2 = 0%), and no significant differences were found from the subgroup analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 128.9 (95% CI, 71.2-233.8), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Based on these promising preliminary results and further testing on a larger dataset, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound could become an important tool for the computer-aided diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer [J].
Bejnordi, Babak Ehteshami ;
Veta, Mitko ;
van Diest, Paul Johannes ;
van Ginneken, Bram ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Litjens, Geert ;
van der Laak, Jeroen A. W. M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (22) :2199-2210
[2]  
Campbell Colin, 2011, Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning, V5, P1
[3]   Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Normal Pancreatic Tissue [J].
Chu, Linda C. ;
Park, Seyoun ;
Kawamoto, Satomi ;
Fouladi, Daniel F. ;
Shayesteh, Shahab ;
Zinreich, Eva S. ;
Graves, Jefferson S. ;
Horton, Karen M. ;
Hruban, Ralph H. ;
Yuille, Alan L. ;
Kinzler, Kenneth W. ;
Vogelstein, Bert ;
Fishman, Elliot K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) :349-357
[4]   Digital image analysis of EUS images accurately differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and normal tissue [J].
Das, Ananya ;
Nguyen, Cuong C. ;
Li, Feng ;
Li, Baoxin .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (06) :861-867
[5]   Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential [J].
Doi, Kunio .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2007, 31 (4-5) :198-211
[6]   Application of artificial intelligence in pancreaticobiliary diseases [J].
Goyal, Hemant ;
Mann, Rupinder ;
Gandhi, Zainab ;
Perisetti, Abhilash ;
Zhang, Zhongheng ;
Sharma, Neil ;
Saligram, Shreyas ;
Inamdar, Sumant ;
Tharian, Benjamin .
THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 14
[7]   Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs [J].
Gulshan, Varun ;
Peng, Lily ;
Coram, Marc ;
Stumpe, Martin C. ;
Wu, Derek ;
Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam ;
Venugopalan, Subhashini ;
Widner, Kasumi ;
Madams, Tom ;
Cuadros, Jorge ;
Kim, Ramasamy ;
Raman, Rajiv ;
Nelson, Philip C. ;
Mega, Jessica L. ;
Webster, R. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22) :2402-2410
[8]   Artificial intelligence in radiology [J].
Hosny, Ahmed ;
Parmar, Chintan ;
Quackenbush, John ;
Schwartz, Lawrence H. ;
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2018, 18 (08) :500-510
[9]   Development of a prediction model for pancreatic cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes using logistic regression and artificial neural network models [J].
Hsieh, Meng Hsuen ;
Sun, Li-Min ;
Lin, Cheng-Li ;
Hsieh, Meng-Ju ;
Hsu, Chung-Y ;
Kao, Chia-Hung .
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 :6317-6324
[10]   Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation [J].
Kamnitsas, Konstantinos ;
Ledig, Christian ;
Newcombe, Virginia F. J. ;
Sirnpson, Joanna P. ;
Kane, Andrew D. ;
Menon, David K. ;
Rueckert, Daniel ;
Glocker, Ben .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2017, 36 :61-78