Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:22
作者
Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana [1 ,2 ]
Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu [3 ]
Cazacu, Irina M. [4 ]
Florescu, Lucian Mihai [5 ]
Streba, Liliana [6 ]
Croitoru, Vlad M. [4 ]
Sur, Daniel [7 ]
Croitoru, Adina [4 ]
Turcu-Stiolica, Adina [8 ]
Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil [6 ]
机构
[1] Inst Oncol, Prof Dr Alexandru Trestioreanu, Soseaua Fundeni, Bucharest 022328, Romania
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Doctoral Sch, Bucharest 020021, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Gastroenterol, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
[4] Fundeni Clin Inst, Dept Oncol, 258 Fundeni St, Bucharest 022238, Romania
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, 2-4 Petru Rares St, Craiova 200349, Romania
[6] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Oncol, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
[7] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu, Dept Med Oncol 11, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
[8] Univ Med & Pharm Craiova, Dept Pharmacoecon, 2 Petru Rares Str, Craiova 200349, Romania
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; computer-aided diagnosis; pancreatic cancer; endoscopic ultrasound; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS; EUS IMAGES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ADENOCARCINOMA; UTILITY; CNN; CT;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12020309
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I-2 = 0%), and no significant differences were found from the subgroup analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 128.9 (95% CI, 71.2-233.8), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Based on these promising preliminary results and further testing on a larger dataset, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound could become an important tool for the computer-aided diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer
    Bejnordi, Babak Ehteshami
    Veta, Mitko
    van Diest, Paul Johannes
    van Ginneken, Bram
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Litjens, Geert
    van der Laak, Jeroen A. W. M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 318 (22): : 2199 - 2210
  • [2] Campbell C., 2011, SYNTH LECT ARTIF INT, V10, P1
  • [3] Utility of CT Radiomics Features in Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Normal Pancreatic Tissue
    Chu, Linda C.
    Park, Seyoun
    Kawamoto, Satomi
    Fouladi, Daniel F.
    Shayesteh, Shahab
    Zinreich, Eva S.
    Graves, Jefferson S.
    Horton, Karen M.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    Yuille, Alan L.
    Kinzler, Kenneth W.
    Vogelstein, Bert
    Fishman, Elliot K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) : 349 - 357
  • [4] Digital image analysis of EUS images accurately differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis and normal tissue
    Das, Ananya
    Nguyen, Cuong C.
    Li, Feng
    Li, Baoxin
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (06) : 861 - 867
  • [5] Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential
    Doi, Kunio
    [J]. COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2007, 31 (4-5) : 198 - 211
  • [6] Application of artificial intelligence in pancreaticobiliary diseases
    Goyal, Hemant
    Mann, Rupinder
    Gandhi, Zainab
    Perisetti, Abhilash
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    Sharma, Neil
    Saligram, Shreyas
    Inamdar, Sumant
    Tharian, Benjamin
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 14
  • [7] Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs
    Gulshan, Varun
    Peng, Lily
    Coram, Marc
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    Wu, Derek
    Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam
    Venugopalan, Subhashini
    Widner, Kasumi
    Madams, Tom
    Cuadros, Jorge
    Kim, Ramasamy
    Raman, Rajiv
    Nelson, Philip C.
    Mega, Jessica L.
    Webster, R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2402 - 2410
  • [8] Artificial intelligence in radiology
    Hosny, Ahmed
    Parmar, Chintan
    Quackenbush, John
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2018, 18 (08) : 500 - 510
  • [9] Development of a prediction model for pancreatic cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes using logistic regression and artificial neural network models
    Hsieh, Meng Hsuen
    Sun, Li-Min
    Lin, Cheng-Li
    Hsieh, Meng-Ju
    Hsu, Chung-Y
    Kao, Chia-Hung
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 6317 - 6324
  • [10] Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
    Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
    Ledig, Christian
    Newcombe, Virginia F. J.
    Sirnpson, Joanna P.
    Kane, Andrew D.
    Menon, David K.
    Rueckert, Daniel
    Glocker, Ben
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2017, 36 : 61 - 78