Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers

被引:148
作者
Dozier, WA
Thaxton, JP
Branton, SL
Morgan, GW
Miles, DM
Roush, WB
Lott, BD
Vizzier-Thaxton, Y
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Poultry Res Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Poultry Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[3] ARS, USDA, Forage & Waste Management Unit, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
关键词
growth performance; processing yield; broiler;
D O I
10.1093/ps/84.8.1332
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study examined responses of male broilers during a 49-d production cycle to 4 placement densities in 2 trials. Trials were pooled because no treatment x trial interaction occurred. In each trial, 1,488 male chicks were randomly placed into 32 floor pens to simulate final densities of 30 (37 chicks/pen), 35 (43 chicks/pen), 40 (50 chicks/pen), and 45 (56 chicks/pen) kg of BW/m(2) of floor space based on a projected final BW of 3.29 kg. Growth rate and nutrient utilization were similar (P >= 0.05) among the treatments from 1 to 32 d of age. From 1 to 49 d, BW gain (P = 0.011) and feed consumption (P = 0.029) were adversely affected by increasing the placement density from 30 to 45 kg of BW/m(2) of floor space. The reduction in cumulative BW gain due to placement density can be partially explained by less feed consumption as evidenced by 95.4% of the sums of squares of BW gain being attributable to feed consumption. Litter moisture content (P = 0.025) and foot pad lesion score (P = 0.001) increased linearly with increasing placement density. Upon processing, whole carcass and breast meat yields relative to BW were not affected (P ! 0.05) as density increased from 30 to 45 kg/m(2). The proportion of whole carcasses with scratches, but not tears, on the back and thighs increased (P = 0.021) as density increased. These results indicate that increasing the density beyond 30 kg/m(2) elicited some negative effects on live performance of heavy broilers.
引用
收藏
页码:1332 / 1338
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SAS US GUID STAT VER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, NUTRIENT REQUIREMENT
[3]  
*AOAC, 1996, 93015 AOAC INT
[4]  
Bessie W., 1992, INFLUENCE FLOOR SPAC
[5]  
Bilgili S. F., 1995, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, V4, P384, DOI 10.1093/japr/4.4.384
[6]  
CARR LE, 1990, T ASAE, V33, P1337, DOI 10.13031/2013.31478
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF EXTENDED POSTHATCH HOLDING TIME AND PLACEMENT DENSITY ON BROILER PERFORMANCE [J].
CASTEEL, ET ;
WILSON, JL ;
BUHR, RJ ;
SANDER, JE .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1994, 73 (11) :1679-1684
[8]   BROILER PRODUCTION UNDER VARYING POPULATION-DENSITIES [J].
CRAVENER, TL ;
ROUSH, WB ;
MASHALY, MM .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1992, 71 (03) :427-433
[9]   SOME EFFECTS OF THYROIDECTOMY ON GROWTH, HEAT-PRODUCTION AND THE THERMOREGULATORY ABILITY OF THE IMMATURE FOWL (GALLUS-DOMESTICUS) [J].
DAVISON, TF ;
MISSON, BH ;
FREEMAN, BM .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 1980, 5 (04) :197-202
[10]   EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND DENSITY ON BROILER PERFORMANCE [J].
DEATON, JW ;
REECE, FN ;
VARDAMAN, TH .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1968, 47 (01) :293-&