Informed Consent-Uninformed Participants: Shortcomings of Online Social Science Consent Forms and Recommendations for Improvement

被引:23
|
作者
Perrault, Evan K. [1 ]
Nazione, Samantha A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Integrated Strateg Commun, Eau Claire, WI 54701 USA
[2] Berry Coll, Commun, Mt Berry, GA USA
关键词
informed consent; consent forms; IRB; length; comprehension; READABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/1556264616654610
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
As informed consent forms continue to lengthen, are these lengthening forms helping to create better informed participants? The aim of this research was to determine whether the length of consent forms affected reading frequency and comprehension, and to provide recommendations on how to improve consent forms in the social sciences so they are more likely to be read. A quasi-experiment was conducted using actual consent forms at two liberal arts schools, one requiring a long form (463 words, n = 73) and one requiring a shorter form (236 words, n = 57). Participants exposed to the shorter form reported fully reading, or at least skimming the form more frequently than those exposed to the longer form. Those exposed to the shorter form also comprehended more of the form's information. The majority of participants indicated consent forms need to be shortened if researchers want future participants to be more likely to read these forms' contents. Additional recommendations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 280
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research
    Perrault, Evan K.
    Keating, David M.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2018, 13 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [2] Information Sheets and Informed Consent Forms for Clinical Study Participants: Towards Standardised Recommendations?
    Chassany, Olivier
    Bernard-Harlaut, Micheline
    Guy, Gilles
    Billon, Nathalie
    THERAPIE, 2009, 64 (03): : 179 - 186
  • [3] Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms
    Geier, Caitlin
    Adams, Robyn B.
    Mitchell, Katharine M.
    Holtz, Bree E.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 16 (03) : 154 - 164
  • [4] The paradox of informed consent in social science and humanities
    Despres, Caroline
    MEDECINE PALLIATIVE, 2020, 19 (06): : 336 - 342
  • [5] Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials
    Silverman, HJ
    Luce, JM
    Lanken, PN
    Morris, AH
    Harabin, AL
    Oldmixon, CF
    Thompson, BT
    Bernard, GR
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04) : 867 - 882
  • [6] Inform the Uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbot
    Xiao, Ziang
    Li, Tifany Wenting
    Karahalios, Karrie
    Sundaram, Hari
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023), 2023,
  • [7] Social Annotation Valence: The Impact on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior
    Balestra, Martina
    Shaer, Orit
    Okerlund, Johanna
    Westendorf, Lauren
    Ball, Madeleine
    Nov, Oded
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (07)
  • [8] What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey
    Karbwang, Juntra
    Koonrungsesomboon, Nut
    Torres, Cristina E.
    Jimenez, Edlyn B.
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Mathur, Roli
    Sholikhah, Eti N.
    Wanigatunge, Chandanie
    Wong, Chih-Shung
    Yimtae, Kwanchanok
    Malek, Murnilina Abdul
    Fouzi, Liyana Ahamad
    Ali, Aisyah
    Chan, Beng Z.
    Chandratilake, Madawa
    Chiew, Shoen C.
    Chin, Melvyn Y. C.
    Gamage, Manori
    Gitek, Irene
    Hakimi, Mohammad
    Hussin, Narwani
    Jamil, Mohd F. A.
    Janarsan, Pavithra
    Julia, Madarina
    Kanungo, Suman
    Karunanayake, Panduka
    Kollanthavelu, Sattian
    Kong, Kian K.
    Kueh, Bing-Ling
    Kulkarni, Ragini
    Kumaran, Paul P.
    Kumarasiri, Ranjith
    Lim, Wei H.
    Lim, Xin J.
    Mahmud, Fatihah
    Mantaring, Jacinto B. V., III
    Ali, Siti M. Md
    Noor, Nurain Mohd
    Muhunthan, Kopalasuntharam
    Nagandran, Elanngovan
    Noor, Maisarah
    Ooi, Kim H.
    Pradeepan, Jebananthy A.
    Sadewa, Ahmad H.
    Samaranayake, Nilakshi
    Ranganathan, Shalini Sri
    Subasingha, Wasanthi
    Subramaniam, Sivasangari
    Sulaiman, Nadirah
    Tay, Ju F.
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 19
  • [9] Informed Consent in Online Studies. How Much Do Participants Really Understand, and Can That Be Changed?
    Schroeder, Annette
    Proll, Lukas
    In-Albon, Tina
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2023, 52 (01): : 38 - 50
  • [10] The Effect of Exposure to Social Annotation on Online Informed Consent Beliefs and Behavior
    Balestra, Martina
    Shaer, Orit
    Okerlund, Johanna
    Ball, Madeleine
    Nov, Oded
    ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW 2016), 2016, : 900 - 912