Consumer preferences for business models in electric vehicle adoption

被引:99
作者
Liao, Fanchao [1 ]
Molin, Eric [1 ]
Timmermans, Harry [2 ,3 ]
van Wee, Bert [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, POB 5015, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Urban Planning Grp, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Air Transportat Management, Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Consumer preference; Business model; Electric vehicle; Leasing; Mobility guarantee; HYBRID CHOICE MODELS; CARS; TECHNOLOGIES; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Successful market penetration of electric vehicles may not only rely on the characteristics of the technology but also on the business models available on the market. This study aims to assess and quantify consumer preferences for business models in the context of Electric Vehicle (EV) adoption. In particular, we explore the impact of attitudes on preferences and choices regarding business models. We examine three business models in the present study: battery leasing, vehicle leasing and mobility guarantee. We design a stated choice experiment to disentangle the effect of business models from other factors and estimate a hybrid choice model. According to the results, the preferences for business models depend on the vehicle type: for battery electric vehicle (BEV), vehicle leasing is the most preferred option and battery leasing is the least preferred, while for conventional cars (CV) and plug-in hybrids (PHEV) the traditional business model of full purchase remains more popular. The attitudes of pro-convenience, pro-ownership and pro-EV leasing are all significantly associated with the choice of business models. As for mobility guarantee, we do not find any significant effect on utility. Finally, we discuss the implications for business strategy and government policy derived from our results.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 24
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, 160706 TRANSPOR ENAC
  • [2] [Anonymous], BUSINESS STRATEGY EN
  • [3] Beaume Romain, 2009, International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, V9, P174, DOI 10.1504/IJATM.2009.026396
  • [4] Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges
    Ben-Akiva, M
    Mcfadden, D
    Train, K
    Walker, J
    Bhat, C
    Bierlaire, M
    Bolduc, D
    Boersch-Supan, A
    Brownstone, D
    Bunch, DS
    Daly, A
    De Palma, A
    Gopinath, D
    Karlstrom, A
    Munizaga, MA
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2002, 13 (03) : 163 - 175
  • [5] Bierlaire M., 2016, 160628 TRANSPOR ENAC
  • [6] Business models for sustainable technologies: Exploring business model evolution in the case of electric vehicles
    Bohnsack, Rene
    Pinkse, Jonatan
    Kolk, Ans
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (02) : 284 - 300
  • [7] Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany
    Bubeck, Steffen
    Tomaschek, Jan
    Fahl, Ulrich
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2016, 50 : 63 - 77
  • [8] Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers
    Chesbrough, Henry
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (2-3) : 354 - 363
  • [9] ChoiceMetrics, 2010, NGENE 1 0 2 US MAN R
  • [10] Can innovative business models overcome resistance to electric vehicles? Better Place and battery electric cars in Denmark
    Christensen, Thomas Budde
    Wells, Peter
    Cipcigan, Liana
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 48 : 498 - 505