Modeling Social Product Development Process, Technology, and Governance

被引:15
作者
Abhari, Kaveh [1 ]
Davidson, Elizabeth J. [2 ]
Xiao, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Fowler Coll Business, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Shidler Coll Business, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
Technological innovation; Product development; Collaboration; Commercialization; Process modeling; Task analysis; Crowdsourcing; innovation management; open innovation; process modeling; social computing; social product development; OPEN INNOVATION PROCESS; CO-INNOVATION; CUSTOMER; COMMUNITIES; DESIGN; MEDIA; PLATFORM; CREATION; ORGANIZATIONS; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2020.2973234
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Social product development (SPD) is an open innovation model in which social technologies and social mechanisms are employed to mobilize individuals in ideation, development, and commercialization of new products. This model holds the promise of engaging a broad and varied community of individuals in innovation activities. However, SPD platforms have struggled to scale early successes and build momentum to become sustainable. To critically assess the viability and paths forward for SPD, we examine social innovation processes, technologies, and platform governance that underlie this open innovation model. We identify six process functions-social engagement, ideation, experiential communication, social validation, codevelopment, and cocommercialization-to model SPD. We examine how these functions are enabled or supported by social technologies and cogoverned by an innovation community, innovation sponsor, and partners in manufacturing and retailing. We assessed the proposed SPD model with case studies of two SPD platforms. This article contributes to the innovation process modeling literature a comprehensive, integrated model of SPD processes, technology, and governance. This holistic model provides a new framework for systematic investigations of SPD for further theorization and empirical study. The proposed model is sufficiently general yet grounded in the phenomenon to guide design, deployment, and governance of socially enabled open innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 422
页数:14
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Collaborative innovation in the sharing economy Profiling social product development actors through classification modeling [J].
Abhari, Kaveh ;
Davidson, Elizabeth J. ;
Xiao, Bo .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2019, 29 (05) :1014-1039
[2]   A risk worth taking? The effects of risk and prior experience on co-innovation participation [J].
Abhari, Kaveh ;
Davidson, Elizabeth J. ;
Xiao, Bo .
INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (03) :804-828
[3]  
Abhari K, 2016, INT SER COMPUT ENTER, P119, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49407-4_6
[4]   Co-innovation platform affordances Developing a conceptual model and measurement instrument [J].
Abhari, Kaveh ;
Davidson, Elizabeth J. ;
Xiao, Bo .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2017, 117 (05) :873-895
[5]   Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process: the relationships between openness, capacities and firm performance [J].
Ahn, Joon Mo ;
Ju, Yonghan ;
Moon, Tae Hee ;
Minshall, Tim ;
Probert, David ;
Sohn, So Young ;
Mortara, Letizia .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2016, 28 (09) :1009-1028
[6]   Implementing open innovation: conceptual design of an integrated ICT platform [J].
Aloini, Davide ;
Farina, Giulia ;
Lazzarotti, Valentina ;
Pellegrini, Luisa .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 21 (06) :1430-1458
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, QUIRKY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, THEORIES COMMUNICATI
[9]   How Does Outside-In Open Innovation Influence Innovation Performance? Analyzing the Mediating Roles of Knowledge Sharing and Innovation Strategy [J].
Bagherzadeh, Mehdi ;
Markovic, Stefan ;
Cheng, Jim ;
Vanhaverbeke, Wim .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 67 (03) :740-753
[10]   Exploring the impact of motivations on the attraction of innovation roles in open innovation web-based platforms [J].
Battistella, Cinzia ;
Nonino, Fabio .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (2-3) :226-245