Examination of geometric and dosimetric accuracies of gated step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:13
|
作者
Wiersma, R. D. [1 ]
Xing, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
gating; step-and-shoot; overshoot phenomena;
D O I
10.1118/1.2776671
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Due to the complicated technical nature of gated radiation therapy, electronic and mechanical limitations may affect the precision of delivery. The purpose of this study is to investigate the geometric and dosimetric accuracies of gated step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation treatments (SS-IMRT). Unique segmental MLC plans are designed, which allow quantitative testing of the gating process. Both ungated and gated deliveries are investigated for different dose sizes, dose rates, and gating window times using a commercial treatment system (Varian Trilogy) together with a respiratory gating system [Varian Real-Time Position Management system]. Radiographic film measurements are used to study the geometric accuracy, where it is found that with both ungated and gated SS-IMRT deliveries the MLC leaf divergence away from planned is less than or equal to the MLC specified leaf tolerance value for all leafs (leaf tolerance being settable from 0.5-5 mm). Nevertheless, due to the MLC controller design, failure to define a specific leaf tolerance value suitable to the SS-IMRT plan can lead to undesired geometric effects, such as leaf motion of up to the maximum 5 mm leaf tolerance value occurring after the beam is turned on. In this case, gating may be advantageous over the ungated case, as it allows more time for the MLC to reach the intended leaf configuration. The dosimetric precision of gated SS-IMRT is investigated using ionization chamber methods. Compared with the ungated case, it is found that gating generally leads to increased dosimetric errors due to the interruption of the "overshoot phenomena." With gating the average timing deviation for intermediate segments is found to be 27 ms, compared to 18 ms for the ungated case. For a plan delivered at 600 MU/min this would correspond to an average segment dose error of similar to 0.27 MU and similar to 0.18 MU for gated and ungated deliveries, respectively. The maximum dosimetric errors for individual intermediate segments are found to deviate by up to similar to 0.64 MU from their planned value when delivered at 600 MU/min using gating, this compares to only similar to 0.32 MU for the ungated case. (C) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3962 / 3970
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a multileaf collimator: Comparison of step-and-shoot and dynamic leaf motion methods
    Chui, CS
    Chan, MF
    Ling, CC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 460 - 462
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Step-And-Shoot, and Sliding Window IMRT for Prostate Cancer
    Schnell, Erich
    Herman, Tania De La Fuente
    Young, Julie
    Hildebrand, Kim
    Algan, Ozer
    Syzek, Elizabeth
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 1494 : 23 - 26
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison between IMRT delivery modes: Step-and-shoot, sliding window, and volumetric modulated arc therapy - for whole pelvis radiation therapy of intermediate-to-high risk prostate adenocarcinoma
    Herman, Tania De La Fuente
    Schnell, Erich
    Young, Julie
    Hildebrand, Kim
    Algan, Ozer
    Syzek, Elizabeth
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 38 (04) : 165 - 172
  • [4] Combining the advantages of step-and-shoot and dynamic delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy by interrupted dynamic sequences
    Martens, C
    De Gersem, W
    De Neve, W
    De Wagter, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (02): : 541 - 550
  • [5] A 4-bank multileaf collimator provides a decomposition advantage for delivering intensity-modulated beams by step-and-shoot
    Webb, S.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 28 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [6] A margin-based analysis of the dosimetric impact of motion on step-and-shoot IMRT lung plans
    Waghorn, Benjamin J.
    Shah, Amish P.
    Rineer, Justin M.
    Langen, Katja M.
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [7] A margin-based analysis of the dosimetric impact of motion on step-and-shoot IMRT lung plans
    Benjamin J Waghorn
    Amish P Shah
    Justin M Rineer
    Katja M Langen
    Sanford L Meeks
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [8] A comparison of the dosimetric effects of intrafraction motion on step-and-shoot, compensator, and helical tomotherapy-based IMRT
    Waghorn, Ben J.
    Staton, Robert J.
    Rineer, Justin M.
    Meeks, Sanford L.
    Langen, Katja M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (03): : 121 - 132
  • [9] The dosimetric comparison and evaluation of helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT), step-and-shoot and sliding window radiotherapy techniques in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Demir, Hikmettin
    Aras, Serhat
    Buyukcizmeci, Nihal
    Yavuz, Berrin Benli
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2022, 193
  • [10] Dosimetric evaluation of the interplay effect in respiratory-gated RapidArc radiation therapy
    Riley, Craig
    Yang, Yong
    Li, Tianfang
    Zhang, Yongqian
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Huq, M. Saiful
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (01)