Revision and improvement of the PTVA-3 model for assessing tsunami building vulnerability using "international expert judgment": introducing the PTVA-4 model

被引:35
作者
Dall'Osso, F. [1 ,4 ]
Dominey-Howes, D. [1 ]
Tarbotton, C. [2 ]
Summerhayes, S. [3 ]
Withycombe, G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Geosci, Asia Pacific Nat Hazards & Disaster Risk Res Grp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Asia Pacific Tsunami Res Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sydney Coastal Councils Grp Inc, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Molino Stewart Pty Ltd, Suite 3,Level 1 20 Wentworth St, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
关键词
Tsunami vulnerability; PTVA model; Building vulnerability; Fragility curves; Catastrophe modelling; FRAGILITY CURVES; DAMAGE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-016-2387-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This work reviewed, assessed, enhanced and field-tested one of the most widely used index-based methods for assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunamis: the Papathoma Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment (PTVA) model. The review and assessment were undertaken through a participatory survey process engaging authors of scientific literature during 2005-2015 in the field of building vulnerability to tsunamis. Expert respondents updated the weights of the PTVA building vulnerability attributes based on their expertise and insights from the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami. The respondents were also free to suggest additional PTVA building attributes and to provide open comments on the model. We then analysed the outcomes of the questionnaire and we used them to generate a new improved version of the model, the PTVA-4, which we field-tested in the area of Botany Bay (Sydney), New South Wales. Using a cohort of over 2000 buildings and a tsunami scenario numerically simulated using state-of-the-art hydrodynamic modelling techniques, we applied the PTVA-4 model and compared the outcomes against its predecessor (i.e. the PTVA-3). Results showed the PTVA-4 model is significantly more accurate and more sensitive to variations in the tsunami demand parameter, the attributes of the exposed buildings and their surroundings. The PTVA-4 model is the first tool of its kind to integrate the judgment of specialised scientists worldwide. It constitutes a viable option to assess the vulnerability of buildings in areas where no tsunami vulnerability curves have been developed yet, or to consider the contribution to vulnerability given by a significantly wider range of building engineering and physical attributes. An ArcGIS toolbox that automatically calculates the relative vulnerability of buildings using the new PTVA-4 model is attached to this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1256
页数:28
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aketa S., 1994, P COAST ENG C, V41, P1176
[2]  
[Anonymous], PORT HACKING PRESENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Occasional Paper No. 2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PMEL135 NOAA OAR
[5]   The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation - a review of current knowledge and practice [J].
Bird, D. K. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2009, 9 (04) :1307-1325
[6]  
Burbidge D, 2008, GEOSCIENCE AUSTR PRO
[7]   Empirical fragility assessment of buildings affected by the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami using improved statistical models [J].
Charvet, I. ;
Ioannou, I. ;
Rossetto, T. ;
Suppasri, A. ;
Imamura, F. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 73 (02) :951-973
[8]   Social vulnerability to environmental hazards [J].
Cutter, SL ;
Boruff, BJ ;
Shirley, WL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 84 (02) :242-261
[9]   The exposure of Sydney (Australia) to earthquake-generated tsunamis, storms and sea level rise: a probabilistic multi-hazard approach [J].
Dall'Osso, F. ;
Dominey-Howes, D. ;
Moore, C. ;
Summerhayes, S. ;
Withycombe, G. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
[10]   Applying and validating the PTVA-3 Model at the Aeolian Islands, Italy: assessment of the vulnerability of buildings to tsunamis [J].
Dall'Osso, F. ;
Maramai, A. ;
Graziani, L. ;
Brizuela, B. ;
Cavalletti, A. ;
Gonella, M. ;
Tinti, S. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 10 (07) :1547-1562