Tumor response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation

被引:47
作者
Ko, Heung-Kyu
Ko, Gi-Young
Yoon, Hyun Ki
Sung, Kyu-Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; chemoembolization;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2007.8.4.320
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the tumor response and patient survival rate following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (r-HCC) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with r-HCC underwent one or more cycles of TACE after LDLT (mean, 2.5 cycles). After a mixture of iodized oil and anti-cancer drugs was injected via the arteries feeding the tumors, these vessels were embolized with a gelatin sponge. Tumor response was determined by follow-up CT imaging on all patients four weeks after each TACE procedure. Patient survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Results: After TACE, targeted tumor reduced in size by 25% or more in 19 of the 28 study patients (67.9%). However, intrahepatic recurrence or extrahepatic metastasis occurred in 21 of the 28 patients (75.0%) during the 3-month follow-up period and in 26 of the 28 patients (92.9%) during the 6-month period following TACE. Extrahepatic metastasis was noted in 18 of the 28 patients (64.3%). The -, 3- and 5-year survival rates following TACE were 47.9, 6.0 and 0%, respectively with a mean survival of nine months in all patients. There were no significant, cant complications related to TACE. Conclusion: TACE produces an effective tumor response for targeted r-HCC after LDLT. However, the survival rate of patients with r-HCC after LDLT is poor due to extrahepatic metastasis and intrahepatic recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 327
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] ATIQ OT, 1992, CANCER, V69, P920, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920215)69:4<920::AID-CNCR2820690414>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-Y
  • [3] LIVER RESECTION VERSUS TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS
    BISMUTH, H
    CHICHE, L
    ADAM, R
    CASTAING, D
    DIAMOND, T
    DENNISON, A
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [4] Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Bruix, J
    Sala, M
    Llovet, JM
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 127 (05) : S179 - S188
  • [5] Chung YH, 2000, CANCER, V88, P1986, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<1986::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-I
  • [7] Evaluation of responses to chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Ebied, OM
    Federle, MP
    Carr, BI
    Pealer, KM
    Li, W
    Amesur, N
    Zajko, A
    [J]. CANCER, 2003, 97 (04) : 1042 - 1050
  • [8] Adult living donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma -: Extending UNOS priority criteria
    Gondolesi, GE
    Roayaie, S
    Muñoz, L
    Kim-Schluger, L
    Schiano, T
    Fishbein, TM
    Emre, S
    Miller, CM
    Schwartz, ME
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [9] Extrahepatic spread from hepatocellular carcinoma: Who are candidates for aggressive anti-cancer treatment?
    Ishii, H
    Furuse, J
    Kinoshita, T
    Konishi, M
    Nakagohri, I
    Takahashi, S
    Gotohda, N
    Nakachi, K
    Yoshino, M
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 34 (12) : 733 - 739
  • [10] Living-donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kaihara, S
    Kiuchi, T
    Ueda, M
    Oike, F
    Fujimoto, Y
    Ogawa, K
    Kozaki, K
    Tanaka, K
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (03) : S37 - S40