SINGLE-ISOCENTER FRAMELESS INTENSITY-MODULATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR SIMULTANEOUS TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE

被引:70
作者
Nath, Sameer K. [1 ,3 ]
Lawson, Joshua D. [1 ,3 ]
Simpson, Daniel R. [1 ,3 ]
VanderSpek, Lauren [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Zhu [1 ]
Alksne, John F. [2 ]
Ciacci, Joseph [2 ]
Mundt, Arno J. [1 ,3 ]
Murphy, Kevin T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Rebecca & John Moores Canc Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Rebecca & John Moores Canc Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Rebecca & John Moores Canc Comprehens Canc Ctr, Ctr Adv Radiotherapy Technol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2010年 / 78卷 / 01期
关键词
Single isocenter; Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery; Frameless; Brain metastases; GAMMA-KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; RADIATION-THERAPY; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; PERFEXION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1726
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe our clinical experience using a unique single-isocenter technique for frameless intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IM-SRS) to treat multiple brain metastases. Methods and Materials: Twenty-six patients with a median of 5 metastases (range, 2-13) underwent optically guided frameless IM-SRS using a single, centrally located isocenter. Median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range, 14-25). Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical examination occurred every 2-4 months. Results: Median follow-up for all patients was 3.3 months (range, 0.2-21.3), with 20 of 26 patients (77%) followed up until their death. For the remaining 6 patients alive at the time of analysis, median follow-up was 14.6 months (range, 9.3-18.0). Total treatment time ranged from 9.0 to 38.9 minutes (median, 21.0). Actuarial 6- and 12-month overall survivals were 50% (95% confidence interval [C.I.], 31-70%) and 38% (95% C.I., 19-56%), respectively. Actuarial 6- and 12-month local control (LC) rates were 97% (95% C.I., 93-100%) and 83% (95% C.I., 71-96%), respectively. Tumors <= 1.5 cm had a better 6-month LC than those >1.5 cm (98% vs. 90%, p = 0.008). New intracranial metastatic disease occurring outside of the treatment volume was observed in 7 patients. Grade >= 3 toxicity occurred in 2 patients (8%). Conclusion: Frameless IM-SRS using a single-isocenter approach for treating multiple intracranial metastases can produce clinical outcomes that compare favorably with those of conventional SRS in a much shorter treatment time (<40 minutes). Given its faster treatment time, this technique is appealing to both patients and personnel in busy clinics. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: dosimetric evaluation of two automated treatment planning systems
    Giorgio Hamid Raza
    Luca Capone
    Paolo Tini
    Martina Giraffa
    Piercarlo Gentile
    Giuseppe Minniti
    Radiation Oncology, 17
  • [22] Simultaneous stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy: a prospective monocentric registry trial
    Bodensohn, Raphael
    Kaempfel, Anna-Lena
    Fleischmann, Daniel Felix
    Hadi, Indrawati
    Hofmaier, Jan
    Garny, Sylvia
    Reiner, Michael
    Forbrig, Robert
    Corradini, Stefanie
    Thon, Niklas
    Belka, Claus
    Niyazi, Maximilian
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2021, 197 (07) : 601 - 613
  • [23] Radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases with single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcs (SIDCA)
    Huang, Yimei
    Chin, Karen
    Robbins, Jared R.
    Kim, Jinkoo
    Li, Haisen
    Amro, Hanan
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Gordon, James
    Ryu, Samuel
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) : 128 - 132
  • [24] Optimization of Treatment Geometry to Reduce Normal Brain Dose in Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases with Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Wu, Qixue
    Snyder, Karen Chin
    Liu, Chang
    Huang, Yimei
    Zhao, Bo
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    Wen, Ning
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [25] How Does the Number of Brain Metastases Correlate With Normal Brain Exposure in Single-Isocenter Multitarget Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Zheng, Dandan
    Yoon, Jihyung
    Jung, Hyunuk
    Lemus, Olga Maria Dona
    Gou, Lang
    Zhou, Yuwei
    Usuki, Kenneth Y.
    Hardy, Sara
    Milano, Michael T.
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 9 (06)
  • [26] Hypofractionated frameless stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of 1–3 brain metastases
    Bruno De Potter
    Gert De Meerleer
    Wilfried De Neve
    Tom Boterberg
    Bruno Speleers
    Piet Ost
    Neurological Sciences, 2013, 34 : 647 - 653
  • [27] Physics considerations for single-isocenter, volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple intracranial targets
    Stanhope, Carl
    Chang, Zheng
    Wang, Zhiheng
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Kim, Grace
    Salama, Joseph K.
    Kirkpatrick, John
    Adamson, Justus
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6 (03) : 207 - 213
  • [28] Intensity-modulated radiosurgery with rapidarc for multiple brain metastases and comparison with static approach
    Wang, Jia-Zhu
    Pawlicki, Todd
    Rice, Roger
    Mundt, Arno J.
    Sandhu, Ajay
    Lawson, Joshua
    Murphy, Kevin T.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [29] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery and Helical Tomotherapy for the Treatment of Multiple Intracranial Metastases
    VanderSpek, Lauren
    Bauman, Glenn
    Wang, Jia-Zhu
    Yartsev, Slav
    Menard, Cynthia
    Cho, Young-Bin
    Mundt, Arno J.
    Lawson, Joshua D.
    Murphy, Kevin T.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2009, 8 (05) : 361 - 367
  • [30] Frame-based radiosurgery of multiple metastases using single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy technique
    Ahn, Kang-Hyun
    Yenice, Kamil M.
    Koshy, Matthew
    Slavin, Konstantin, V
    Aydogan, Bulent
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 21 - 28