The Interplay of Elicitation and Evaluation of Trait-Expressive Behavior: Evidence in Assessment Center Exercises

被引:32
作者
Lievens, Filip [1 ]
Schollaert, Eveline [2 ]
Keen, Gert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Coll Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[3] D PBO, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
assessment center; behavior elicitation; interpersonal; situational stimuli; role-plays; ASSESSMENT-CENTER RATINGS; ROLE-PLAYER PROMPTS; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; ACTIVATION THEORY; GOOD JUDGE; PERSONALITY; CONSISTENCY; DIMENSION; ACCURACY; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1037/apl0000004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In assessment centers (ACs), research on eliciting candidate behavior and evaluating candidate behavior have largely followed independent paths. This study integrates trait activation and trait rating models to posit hypotheses about the effects of behavior elicitation via situational cues on key assessor observation and rating variables. To test the hypotheses, a series of experimental and field studies are conducted. Only when trait-expressive behavior activation and evaluation models work in conjunction, increases in observability are coupled with increases in the interrater reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and accuracy of AC ratings. Implications of these findings for AC theory and practice are formulated.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1188
页数:20
相关论文
共 86 条
[11]   Back to Basics of Test Construction and Scoring [J].
Brannick, Michael T. .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2008, 1 (01) :131-133
[12]   CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF IN-BASKET SCORES [J].
BRANNICK, MT ;
MICHAELS, CE ;
BAKER, DP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06) :957-963
[13]  
Brennan RL, 2001, Generalizability Theory
[14]   CONSTRUCTING PARALLEL SIMULATION EXERCISES FOR ASSESSMENT CENTERS AND OTHER FORMS OF BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT [J].
Brummel, Bradley J. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Spain, Seth M. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (01) :137-170
[15]   SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY IN ASSESSMENT-CENTER RATINGS - A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
BYCIO, P ;
ALVARES, KM ;
HAHN, J .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (03) :463-474
[16]  
Campion M.C., 2013, Handbook of Personality at Work, P439, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203526910.CH19
[17]   The good judge revisited: Individual differences in the accuracy of personality judgments [J].
Christiansen, ND ;
Wolcott-Burnam, S ;
Janovics, JE ;
Burns, GN ;
Quirk, SW .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2005, 18 (02) :123-149
[18]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[19]  
Connelly B.S., 2004, REEXAMINING ASSESSME
[20]   A METAANALYSIS OF INTERRATER AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY RELIABILITY OF SELECTION INTERVIEWS [J].
CONWAY, JM ;
JAKO, RA ;
GOODMAN, DF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 80 (05) :565-579