A Clinicopathological Nomogram to Predict Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

被引:0
作者
Naffouje, Samer A. [1 ]
Tulla, Kiara A. [1 ]
Salti, George, I [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Dept Gen Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Div Surg Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Edward Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Naperville, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Lymph Nodes; Nomograms; Pancreas; EXTENDED RETROPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PERIAMPULLARY ADENOCARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LYMPH-NODES; CANCER; SURVIVAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction We aim to develop a nomogram that predicts the nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was used. Patients without distant metastasis who received R0 resection and had = 12 nodes retrieved were considered for the analysis. Significant predictors of N1 were concluded from a multivariate regression model and were used to establish the nomogram, which was internally validated using the 10-fold cross-validation method. Results 6,422 patients were found eligible to derive the nomogram. Overall survival of N0 vs. N1 patients was 35.15 +/- 1.45 vs. 21.82 +/- 0.44 months. The multivariate regression identified increasing age and receiving neoadjuvant radiation as favorable predictors, whereas pancreatic head cancers, lymph-vascular invasion, histologic grade, and pathologic T stage were identified as poor predictors of nodal metastasis. The bias-corrected concordance index for the nomogram was 0.756 (95% CI 0.743-0.769). Calibration was tested based on decile groups and no difference was noted between the predicted and observed N1 (p= 0.804). Youden's index identified the predicted probability of 53.40% to be the optimal cut-off for the nomogram. When applied to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with inadequate node sampling (< 12), overall survival for predicted N0 vs. N1 based on the nomogram were 29.90 +/- 1.41 vs. 20.57 +/- 0.72 months which is comparable to those with confirmed N0 vs. N1. Conclusion Prediction of nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is critical. Development of a nomogram based on available clinicopathological features of the primary tumor to predict nodal involvement in light of inadequate node dissection is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Combining Clinicopathological Parameters and Molecular Indicators to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrioid Type Endometrial Adenocarcinoma [J].
Jiang, Peng ;
Huang, Yuzhen ;
Tu, Yuan ;
Li, Ning ;
Kong, Wei ;
Di, Feiyao ;
Jiang, Shan ;
Zhang, Jingni ;
Yi, Qianlin ;
Yuan, Rui .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[32]   Para-aortic lymph node involvement should not be a contraindication to resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Pande, Rupaly ;
Chughtai, Shafiq ;
Ahuja, Manish ;
Brown, Rachel ;
Bartlett, David C. ;
Dasari, Bobby, V ;
Marudanayagam, Ravi ;
Mirza, Darius ;
Roberts, Keith ;
Isaac, John ;
Sutcliffe, Robert P. ;
Chatzizacharias, Nikolaos A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 14 (05) :429-441
[33]   Lymph node size and its association with nodal metastasis in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [J].
Shin, Jaehoon ;
Shin, Seungbeom ;
Lee, Jae Hoon ;
Song, Ki Byung ;
Hwang, Dae Wook ;
Kim, Hyoung Jung ;
Byun, Jae Ho ;
Cho, HyungJun ;
Kim, Song Cheol ;
Hong, Seung-Mo .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 (05) :387-395
[34]   A Novel Nomogram to Predict Survival in Patients With Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Resection [J].
He, Chaobin ;
Sun, Shuxin ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Lin, Xiaojun ;
Li, Shengping .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
[35]   Prognostic impact of nodal statuses in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Fukuda, Yasunari ;
Asaoka, Tadafumi ;
Maeda, Sakae ;
Hama, Naoki ;
Miyamoto, Atsushi ;
Mori, Masaki ;
Doki, Yuichiro ;
Nakamori, Shoji .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2017, 17 (02) :279-284
[36]   Improvement in Treatment and Outcome of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in North China [J].
Chen, Yong ;
Hao, JiHui ;
Ma, WeiDong ;
Tang, Yong ;
Gao, ChunTao ;
Hao, XiShan .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 15 (06) :1026-1034
[37]   Ovarian Metastasis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Habib, Joseph R. ;
Pasha, Shamsher ;
Khan, Subhan ;
Kinny-Koster, Benedict ;
Shoucair, Sami ;
Thompson, Elizabeth D. ;
Yu, Jun ;
Lafaro, Kelly ;
Burkhart, Richard A. ;
Burns, William R. ;
Ronnett, Brigitte M. ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Hruban, Ralph H. ;
He, Jin ;
Fishman, Elliot K. ;
Javed, Ammar A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (10) :3157-3164
[38]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Nomogram From Primary Tumor for Pretreatment Prediction of Peripancreatic Lymph Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study [J].
Shi, Zhenshan ;
Ma, Chengle ;
Huang, Xinming ;
Cao, Dairong .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 55 (03) :823-839
[39]   Neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Brown, Zachary J. ;
Shannon, Alexander H. ;
Cloyd, Jordan M. .
MINERVA SURGERY, 2024, :315-325
[40]   Resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with synchronous distant metastasis: is it worthwhile? [J].
Buc, Emmanuel ;
Orry, David ;
Antomarchi, Olivier ;
Gagniere, Johan ;
Da Ines, David ;
Pezet, Denis .
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 12