A Clinicopathological Nomogram to Predict Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

被引:0
作者
Naffouje, Samer A. [1 ]
Tulla, Kiara A. [1 ]
Salti, George, I [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Dept Gen Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Div Surg Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Edward Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Naperville, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Lymph Nodes; Nomograms; Pancreas; EXTENDED RETROPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PERIAMPULLARY ADENOCARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LYMPH-NODES; CANCER; SURVIVAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction We aim to develop a nomogram that predicts the nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was used. Patients without distant metastasis who received R0 resection and had = 12 nodes retrieved were considered for the analysis. Significant predictors of N1 were concluded from a multivariate regression model and were used to establish the nomogram, which was internally validated using the 10-fold cross-validation method. Results 6,422 patients were found eligible to derive the nomogram. Overall survival of N0 vs. N1 patients was 35.15 +/- 1.45 vs. 21.82 +/- 0.44 months. The multivariate regression identified increasing age and receiving neoadjuvant radiation as favorable predictors, whereas pancreatic head cancers, lymph-vascular invasion, histologic grade, and pathologic T stage were identified as poor predictors of nodal metastasis. The bias-corrected concordance index for the nomogram was 0.756 (95% CI 0.743-0.769). Calibration was tested based on decile groups and no difference was noted between the predicted and observed N1 (p= 0.804). Youden's index identified the predicted probability of 53.40% to be the optimal cut-off for the nomogram. When applied to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with inadequate node sampling (< 12), overall survival for predicted N0 vs. N1 based on the nomogram were 29.90 +/- 1.41 vs. 20.57 +/- 0.72 months which is comparable to those with confirmed N0 vs. N1. Conclusion Prediction of nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is critical. Development of a nomogram based on available clinicopathological features of the primary tumor to predict nodal involvement in light of inadequate node dissection is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   CT-measured body composition radiomics predict lymph node metastasis in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Gu, Qianbiao ;
He, Mengqing ;
He, Yaqiong ;
Dai, Anqi ;
Liu, Jianbin ;
Chen, Xiang ;
Liu, Peng .
DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (01)
[22]   Initial pulmonary metastasis after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Shimizu, Tetsunosuke ;
Taniguchi, Kohei ;
Asakuma, Mitsuhiro ;
Komeda, Koji ;
Inoue, Yoshihiro ;
Lee, Sang-Woong ;
Hirokawa, Fumitoshi ;
Uchiyama, Kazuhisa .
SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (04) :413-418
[23]   Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on a Radiomics Nomogram of Dual-Parametric MRI Imaging [J].
Shi, Lin ;
Wang, Ling ;
Wu, Cuiyun ;
Wei, Yuguo ;
Zhang, Yang ;
Chen, Junfa .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[24]   Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Survival in Pancreatic Head Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Peng, Feng ;
Qin, Tingting ;
Wang, Min ;
Wang, Hebin ;
Dang, Chao ;
Wu, Chien-Hui ;
Tien, Yu-Wen ;
Qin, Renyi .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[25]   Prognostic Nomogram for Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Zhuang, Hongkai ;
Zhou, Zixuan ;
Ma, Zuyi ;
Huang, Shanzhou ;
Gong, Yuanfeng ;
Li, Zhenchong ;
Liu, Chunsheng ;
Wang, Shujie ;
Chen, Bo ;
Zhang, Chuanzhao ;
Hou, Baohua .
CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 15
[26]   The role of clinicopathological features in the prognosis of resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study [J].
Safaei, Masoomeh ;
Mortezaei, Nima Taghizadeh ;
Azmoudeh-Ardalan, Farid ;
Jafarian, Ali ;
Niyari, Elham Ebrahimi ;
Bouzari, Behnaz .
IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA PERSA, 2025, 11 (02)
[27]   N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Valsangkar, Nakul P. ;
Bush, Devon M. ;
Michaelson, James S. ;
Ferrone, Cristina R. ;
Wargo, Jennifer A. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos ;
Warshaw, Andrew L. ;
Thayer, Sarah P. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (02) :257-266
[28]   Prognostic Relevance of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Sergeant, Gregory ;
Ectors, Nadine ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
Aerts, Raymond ;
Topal, Baki .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) :3070-3079
[29]   Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [J].
Kleeff, Joerg ;
Reiser, Carolin ;
Hinz, Ulf ;
Bachmann, Jeannine ;
Debus, Jurgen ;
Jaeger, Dirk ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Buechler, Markus W. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (04) :566-572
[30]   Use of Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis among Patients with Cervical Adenocarcinoma [J].
Tian, Yongju ;
Hao, Yiping ;
Liu, Qingqing ;
Li, Ruowen ;
Mao, Zhonghao ;
Jiang, Nan ;
Wang, Bingyu ;
Zhang, Wenjing ;
Zhang, Xiaofang ;
Cui, Baoxia .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 2022