A Clinicopathological Nomogram to Predict Node Metastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

被引:0
作者
Naffouje, Samer A. [1 ]
Tulla, Kiara A. [1 ]
Salti, George, I [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Dept Gen Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Illinois Hosp & Hlth Sci Syst, Div Surg Oncol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Edward Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Naperville, IL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE PANCREAS | 2019年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
Adenocarcinoma; Lymph Nodes; Nomograms; Pancreas; EXTENDED RETROPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PERIAMPULLARY ADENOCARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; LYMPH-NODES; CANCER; SURVIVAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; HEAD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction We aim to develop a nomogram that predicts the nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods The National Cancer Database for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was used. Patients without distant metastasis who received R0 resection and had = 12 nodes retrieved were considered for the analysis. Significant predictors of N1 were concluded from a multivariate regression model and were used to establish the nomogram, which was internally validated using the 10-fold cross-validation method. Results 6,422 patients were found eligible to derive the nomogram. Overall survival of N0 vs. N1 patients was 35.15 +/- 1.45 vs. 21.82 +/- 0.44 months. The multivariate regression identified increasing age and receiving neoadjuvant radiation as favorable predictors, whereas pancreatic head cancers, lymph-vascular invasion, histologic grade, and pathologic T stage were identified as poor predictors of nodal metastasis. The bias-corrected concordance index for the nomogram was 0.756 (95% CI 0.743-0.769). Calibration was tested based on decile groups and no difference was noted between the predicted and observed N1 (p= 0.804). Youden's index identified the predicted probability of 53.40% to be the optimal cut-off for the nomogram. When applied to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with inadequate node sampling (< 12), overall survival for predicted N0 vs. N1 based on the nomogram were 29.90 +/- 1.41 vs. 20.57 +/- 0.72 months which is comparable to those with confirmed N0 vs. N1. Conclusion Prediction of nodal status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is critical. Development of a nomogram based on available clinicopathological features of the primary tumor to predict nodal involvement in light of inadequate node dissection is feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Initial pulmonary metastasis after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
    Taniguchi, Kohei
    Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
    Komeda, Koji
    Inoue, Yoshihiro
    Lee, Sang-Woong
    Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [22] Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on a Radiomics Nomogram of Dual-Parametric MRI Imaging
    Shi, Lin
    Wang, Ling
    Wu, Cuiyun
    Wei, Yuguo
    Zhang, Yang
    Chen, Junfa
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Survival in Pancreatic Head Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Peng, Feng
    Qin, Tingting
    Wang, Min
    Wang, Hebin
    Dang, Chao
    Wu, Chien-Hui
    Tien, Yu-Wen
    Qin, Renyi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [24] Prognostic Nomogram for Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Zhuang, Hongkai
    Zhou, Zixuan
    Ma, Zuyi
    Huang, Shanzhou
    Gong, Yuanfeng
    Li, Zhenchong
    Liu, Chunsheng
    Wang, Shujie
    Chen, Bo
    Zhang, Chuanzhao
    Hou, Baohua
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 15
  • [25] N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The Effect of Lymph Node Number on Accurate Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Valsangkar, Nakul P.
    Bush, Devon M.
    Michaelson, James S.
    Ferrone, Cristina R.
    Wargo, Jennifer A.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos
    Warshaw, Andrew L.
    Thayer, Sarah P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [26] Prognostic Relevance of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Sergeant, Gregory
    Ectors, Nadine
    Fieuws, Steffen
    Aerts, Raymond
    Topal, Baki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) : 3070 - 3079
  • [27] Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Kleeff, Joerg
    Reiser, Carolin
    Hinz, Ulf
    Bachmann, Jeannine
    Debus, Jurgen
    Jaeger, Dirk
    Friess, Helmut
    Buechler, Markus W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (04) : 566 - 572
  • [28] Use of Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis among Patients with Cervical Adenocarcinoma
    Tian, Yongju
    Hao, Yiping
    Liu, Qingqing
    Li, Ruowen
    Mao, Zhonghao
    Jiang, Nan
    Wang, Bingyu
    Zhang, Wenjing
    Zhang, Xiaofang
    Cui, Baoxia
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 2022
  • [29] Para-aortic lymph node involvement should not be a contraindication to resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Pande, Rupaly
    Chughtai, Shafiq
    Ahuja, Manish
    Brown, Rachel
    Bartlett, David C.
    Dasari, Bobby, V
    Marudanayagam, Ravi
    Mirza, Darius
    Roberts, Keith
    Isaac, John
    Sutcliffe, Robert P.
    Chatzizacharias, Nikolaos A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 14 (05): : 429 - 441
  • [30] Combining Clinicopathological Parameters and Molecular Indicators to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrioid Type Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
    Jiang, Peng
    Huang, Yuzhen
    Tu, Yuan
    Li, Ning
    Kong, Wei
    Di, Feiyao
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhang, Jingni
    Yi, Qianlin
    Yuan, Rui
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11