An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change

被引:25
作者
Lewis, David J. [1 ]
Polasky, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Appl Econ, 200 A Ballard Ext Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Appl Econ, 1994 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Conservation planning; Climate change adaptation; Spatial modeling; Land use; Auctions; Asymmetric information; Truthful mechanism; Irreversibility; Option value; AGGLOMERATION BONUS; REAL OPTIONS; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT; HABITAT; FRAGMENTATION; PRESERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The provision of many ecosystem services depends on the spatial pattern of land use across multiple landowners. Even holding land use constant, ecosystem service provision may change through time due to climate change. This paper develops an auction mechanism that implements an optimal solution for providing ecosystem services through time with multiple landowners who have private information about the net benefits of alternative uses of their land. Under the auction, each landowner has a dominant strategy to truthfully reveal their private information. With this information a regulator can then implement the optimal landscape pattern, which maximizes the present value of net benefits derived from the landscape, following the rules of the auction mechanism. The auction can be designed as a subsidy auction that pays landowners to conserve or a tax auction where landowners pay for the right to develop. Our mechanism optimizes social adaptation of ecosystem management to climate change. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 34
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Application of portfolio theory to asset-based biosecurity decision analysis [J].
Akter, Sonia ;
Kompas, Tom ;
Ward, Michael B. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 :73-85
[2]  
Albers H.J., 1996, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V30, P73
[3]   Diversifying to Reduce Conservation Outcome Uncertainty in Multiple Environmental Objectives [J].
Ando, Amy ;
Howlader, Aparna ;
Mallory, Mindy .
AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2018, 47 (02) :220-238
[4]   Optimal portfolio design to reduce climate-related conservation uncertainty in the Prairie Pothole Region [J].
Ando, Amy W. ;
Mallory, Mindy L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (17) :6484-6489
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Public choice, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01726210
[7]   An introduction to biodiversity concepts for environmental economists [J].
Armsworth, PR ;
Kendall, BE ;
Davis, FW .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :115-136
[8]   Adverse Selection in Reverse Auctions for Ecosystem Services [J].
Arnold, Michael A. ;
Duke, Joshua M. ;
Messer, Kent D. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2013, 89 (03) :387-412
[9]   ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION, UNCERTAINTY, AND IRREVERSIBILITY [J].
ARROW, KJ ;
FISHER, AC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1974, 88 (02) :312-319
[10]   The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks [J].
Banerjee, Simanti ;
de Vries, Frans P. ;
Hanley, Nick ;
van Soest, Daan P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 96 (04) :1009-1029