A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer based on margin status

被引:40
作者
Kauffmann, Emanuele F. [1 ]
Napoli, Niccolo [1 ]
Menonna, Francesca [1 ]
Iacopi, Sara [1 ]
Lombardo, Carlo [1 ]
Bernardini, Juri [1 ]
Amorese, Gabriella [2 ]
Insilla, Andrea Cacciato [3 ]
Funel, Niccola [3 ]
Campani, Daniela [3 ]
Cappelli, Carla [4 ]
Caramella, Davide [4 ]
Boggi, Ugo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Div Gen & Transplant Surg, Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Div Anesthesia & Intens Care, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Pisa, Div Pathol, Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Pisa, Div Radiol, Pisa, Italy
[5] Univ Pisa, Azienda Osped Univ Pisana, Via Paradisa 2, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Tumor margins; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy; Propensity score; Sample size calculation; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LEARNING-CURVE; R1; RESECTION; SURGERY; THERAPY; FISTULA; ARTERY; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6301-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundNo study has shown the oncologic non-inferiority of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for pancreatic cancer (PC).MethodsThis is a single institution propensity score matched study comparing RPD and ODP for resectable PC, based on factors predictive of R1 resection (1mm). Only patients operated on after completion of the learning curve in both procedures and for whom circumferential margins were assessed according to the Leeds pathology protocol were included. The primary study endpoint was the rate of R1 resection. Secondary study endpoints were as follows: number of examined lymph nodes (N), rate of perioperative transfusions, percentage of patients receiving adjuvant therapies, occurrence of local recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and sample size calculation for randomized controlled trials (RCT).ResultsFactors associated with R1 resection were tumor diameter, number of positive N, N ratio, logarithm odds of positive N, and duodenal infiltration. The matching process identified 20 RPDs and 24 OPDs. All RPDs were completed robotically. R1 resection was identified in 11 RPDs (55.0%) and in 10 OPDs (41.7%) (p=0.38). There was no difference in the rate of R1 at each margin as well as in the proportion of patients with multiple R1 margins. RPD and OPD were also equivalent with respect to all secondary study endpoints, with a trend towards lower rate of blood transfusions in RPD. Based on the figures presented herein, a non-inferiority RCT comparing RPD and OPD having the rate of R1 resection as the primary study endpoint requires 3355 pairs.ConclusionsRPD and OPD achieved the same rate of R1 resections in resectable PC. RPD was also non-inferior to OPD with respect to all secondary study endpoints. Because of the high number of patients required to run a RCT, further assessment of RPD for PC would require the implementation of an international registry.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Ball, Chad G. ;
Pitt, Henry A. ;
Kilbane, Molly E. ;
Dixon, Elijah ;
Sutherland, Francis R. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. .
HPB, 2010, 12 (07) :465-471
[2]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[3]   Neoadjuvant therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: A critical review [J].
Belli, Carmen ;
Cereda, Stefano ;
Anand, Santosh ;
Reni, Michele .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2013, 39 (05) :518-524
[4]   Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Boggi, U. ;
Signori, S. ;
De Lio, N. ;
Perrone, V. G. ;
Vistoli, F. ;
Belluomini, M. ;
Cappelli, C. ;
Amorese, G. ;
Mosca, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (07) :917-925
[5]   Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections [J].
Boggi, Ugo ;
Napoli, Niccolo ;
Costa, Francesca ;
Kauffmann, Emanuele F. ;
Menonna, Francesca ;
Iacopi, Sara ;
Vistoli, Fabio ;
Amorese, Gabriella .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (10) :2497-2506
[6]   Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review [J].
Boggi, Ugo ;
Amorese, Gabriella ;
Vistoli, Fabio ;
Caniglia, Fabio ;
De Lio, Nelide ;
Perrone, Vittorio ;
Barbarello, Linda ;
Belluomini, Mario ;
Signori, Stefano ;
Mosca, Franco .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (01) :9-23
[7]   Prognostic implications of tumor invasion or adhesion to peripancreatic vessels in resected pancreatic cancer [J].
Boggi, Ugo ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Croce, Chiara ;
Vistoli, Fabio ;
Signori, Stefano ;
Moretto, Carlo ;
Amorese, Gabriella ;
Mazzeo, Salvatore ;
Cappelli, Carla ;
Campani, Daniela ;
Mosca, Franco .
SURGERY, 2009, 146 (05) :869-881
[8]   A systematic review of the role of periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery in affecting margin status after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [J].
Butler, James R. ;
Ahmad, Syed A. ;
Katz, Matthew H. ;
Cioffi, Jessica L. ;
Zyromski, Nicholas J. .
HPB, 2016, 18 (04) :305-311
[9]   A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Pratt, Wande B. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) :1-14
[10]   Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery Versus Surgery Alone in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Which Failed to Achieve Accrual Targets [J].
Casadei, Riccardo ;
Di Marco, Mariacristina ;
Ricci, Claudio ;
Santini, Donatella ;
Serra, Carla ;
Calculli, Lucia ;
D'Ambra, Marielda ;
Guido, Alessandra ;
Morselli-Labate, Antonio Maria ;
Minni, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (10) :1802-1812