Body-size Relations and Mouth Dimensions of Fresh and Preserved Freshwater Fish

被引:0
作者
Bobori, Dimitra C. [1 ]
Moutopoulos, Dimitrios K. [2 ]
Chalkia, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Biol, Dept Zool, Lab Ichthyol, POB 134, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Technol Educ Inst Western Greece, Dept Fisheries Aquaculture Technol, Mesolonghi 30200, Greece
来源
ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA | 2020年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
Fish external morphology; mouth area; maximum body height; rivers; collection; Greece; LIFE-HISTORY; BARBUS; SELECTIVITY; CYPRINIDAE; TELEOSTEI; ECOLOGY; GROWTH; RIVER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The relations between fish total (TL) fork (FL) and standard (SL) lengths, between TL and maximum height (H-max) and horizontal (HMO) and vertical (VMO) mouth openings and mouth area (MA) of four freshwater fish species (Alburnoides thessalicus, Barbus strumicae, B. balcanicus and Squalius vardarunsis) are estimated for several rivers of northern Greece. The same relations for B. strumicae and S. vardarunsis are also provided based on preserved samples deposited in the fish collection of the Laboratory of Ichthyology (School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki). The relations between different lengths are all linear. The relations between HMO - TL and VMO - TL are either linear or exponential depending on the species and on the water system, while MA is exponentially related to IL for all studied species. Mouth area (MA) increases faster with TL, for S. vardarunsis, which has a higher trophic level than for B. balcanicus and B. strumicae. Differences are also found for the slope (parameter b) of the above relations between fresh and preserved samples and between the same species from different river systems. Such relations are important for defining the ecological position of each species in the food web and, thus, are used in ecosystem-based models.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 66
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BIOSTAT ANAL
[2]  
BARROS T. F, 2018, J APPL ICHTHYOL, V34, P11881
[3]  
Bobori D. C., 2006, Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, V9, P407, DOI 10.1080/14634980601027855
[4]  
Bobori DC, 2006, FOLIA ZOOL, V55, P199
[5]  
Bobori DC, 2013, J BIOL RES-THESSALON, V19, P139
[6]  
CONE RS, 1989, T AM FISH SOC, V118, P510, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1989)118<0511:TNTRTU>2.3.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Fish mouth dimensions and size selectivity in a Portuguese longline fishery [J].
Erzini, K ;
Goncalves, JMS ;
Bentes, L ;
Lino, PG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE ICHTHYOLOGIE, 1997, 13 (01) :41-44
[9]  
Karachle P. K., 2014, MEDITERRANEAN MARINE, V15, P213, DOI [10.12681/MMS.738, DOI 10.12681/MMS.738]
[10]   The relationships between mouth size and shape and body length for 18 species of marine fishes and their trophic implications [J].
Karpouzi, VS ;
Stergiou, KI .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2003, 62 (06) :1353-1365