Performance measurement of the microPET focus 120 scanner

被引:140
作者
Kim, Jin Su [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Jae Sung [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Im, Ki Chun [4 ]
Kim, Su Jin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Seog-Young [4 ]
Lee, Dong Soo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moon, Dae Hyuk [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Interdisciplinary Program Radiat, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Interdisciplinary Program Appl Life Sci Major, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
small-animal PET; performance measurement; instrumentation; molecular imaging; small-animal imaging;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.107.040550
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The microPET Focus 120 scanner is a third-generation animal PET scanner dedicated to rodent imaging. Here, we report the results of scanner performance testing. Methods: A Ge-68 point source was used to measure energy resolution, which was determined for each crystal and averaged. Spatial resolution was measured using a Na-22 point source with a nominal size of 0.25 mm at the system center and various off-center positions. Absolute sensitivity without attenuation was determined by extrapolating the data measured using an F-18 line source and multiple layers of absorbers. Scatter fraction and counting rate performance were measured using 2 different cylindric phantoms simulating rat and mouse bodies. Sensitivity, scatter fraction, and noise equivalent counting rate (NECR) experiments were repeated under 4 different conditions (energy window, 250 similar to 750 keV or 350 similar to 650 keV; coincidence window, 6 or 10 ns). A performance phantom with hot-rod inserts of various sizes was scanned, and several animal studies were also performed. Results: Energy resolution at a 511 -keV photopeak was 18.3% on average. Radial, tangential, and axial resolution of images reconstructed with the Fourier rebinning (FORE) and filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithms were 1.18 (radial), 1.13 (tangential), and 1.45 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) (axial) at center and 2.35 (radial), 1.66 (tangential), and 2.00 mm FWHM (axial) at a radial offset of 2 cm. Absolute sensitivities at transaxial and axial centers were 7.0% (250 similar to 750 keV, 10 ns), 6.7% (250 similar to 750 keV, 6 ns), 4.0% (350 similar to 650 keV, 10 ns), and 3.8% (350 similar to 650 keV, 6 ns). Scatter fractions were 15.9% (mouse phantom) and 35.0% (rat phantom) for 250 similar to 750 keV and 6 ns. Peak NECR was 869 kcps at 3,242 kBq/mL (mouse phantom) and 228 kcps at 290 kBq/mL (rat phantom) at 250 similar to 750 keV and 6 ns. Hot-rod inserts of 1.6-mm diameter were clearly identified, and animal studies illustrated the feasibility of this system for studies of whole rodents and mid-sized animal brains. Conclusion: The results of this independent field test showed the improved physical characteristics of the F120 scanner over the previous microPET series systems. This system will be useful for imaging studies on small rodents and brains of larger animals.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1535
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Developments in component-based normalization for 3D PET
    Badawi, RD
    Marsden, PK
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (02) : 571 - 594
  • [2] A METHOD FOR MEASURING THE ABSOLUTE SENSITIVITY OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNERS
    BAILEY, DL
    JONES, T
    SPINKS, TJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (06): : 374 - 379
  • [3] Bateman TM, 2004, AM J CARDIOL, V94, p19D
  • [4] [18F]FLT-PET in oncology:: current status and opportunities
    Been, LB
    Suurmeijer, AJH
    Cobben, DCP
    Jager, PL
    Hoekstra, HJ
    Elsinga, PH
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (12) : 1659 - 1672
  • [5] Chatziioannou Arion F, 2002, Mol Imaging Biol, V4, P47, DOI 10.1016/S1095-0397(01)00067-X
  • [6] Daube-Witherspoon ME, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1398
  • [7] DAUBEWITHERSPOON ME, 1987, J NUCL MED, V28, P1717
  • [8] Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data
    Defrise, M
    Kinahan, PE
    Townsend, DW
    Michel, C
    Sibomana, M
    Newport, DF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (02) : 145 - 158
  • [9] Erdi YE, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P813
  • [10] The ECAT HRRT: An example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO-based PET systems
    Eriksson, L
    Watson, CC
    Wienhard, K
    Eriksson, M
    Casey, ME
    Knoess, C
    Lenox, M
    Burbar, Z
    Conti, M
    Bendriem, B
    Heiss, WD
    Nutt, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2005, 52 (01) : 90 - 94