Reconstruction of the Denonvillier's fascia and posterior ligament of the external urethral sphincter: Assessment of its effect on urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:4
作者
Passos, Pedro Sousa [1 ,2 ]
Anacleto, Sara Teixeira [1 ]
Versos, Rui Simeao [2 ]
Alves, Mario Cerqueira [1 ]
Mota, Paulo Oliveira [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Braga, Dept Urol, Braga, Portugal
[2] Hosp Guimaraes, Dept Urol, Guimaraes, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, Inst Life & Hlth Sci, Braga, Portugal
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Rhabdosphincter reconstruction; Postoperative complications; Erectile dysfunction; Urinary continence; POSTPROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE; MUSCULOFASCIAL RECONSTRUCTION; RHABDOSPHINCTER; VALIDATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.4081/aiua.2021.3.274
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Some studies have shown that rhabdosphincter reconstruction provides an earlier return to continence after radical prostatectomy. We aim to study the impact of this procedure in urinary continence along with comparing two specific surgical techniques for posterior reconstruction. Materials and methods: We studied a group of patients who were submitted to LRP with No Rhabdosphincter Reconstruction (NRR) and another group with Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter (PRR). The latter was further divided into two groups: "Rocco type stitch" group and "Bollens type stitch" group. We used three questionnaires (IIEF-5, ,ICIQ-SF and IPSS) to assess urinary continence and erectile function 90 days after surgery. Results: Patients of PRR group had a better full continence rate than patients of NRR group at 90 days (96.6% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001). Concerning urinary incontinence (p = 0.116), lower urinary tract symptoms (p = 0543) and postoperative complication rates (p = 0.738), our results suggested that there were no differences between the techniques studied. Conclusions: Posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter has significant benefits for urinary continence recovery on patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. No differences were observed in continence recovery between the two techniques analyzed. Additionally, reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter appears to he a safe procedure with no increased risk of postoperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Incontinence and erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: A review [J].
Alivizatos, Gerasimos ;
Skolarikos, Andreas .
THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2005, 5 :747-758
[2]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[3]  
Berger M, 1999, J Bras Urol, V25, P225
[4]   Posterior muscle-fascial reconstruction and knotless urethro-neo bladder anastomosis during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of the technique and its impact on urinary continence [J].
Bianchi, Federico Mineo ;
Romagnoli, Daniele ;
D'Agostino, Daniele ;
Salvaggio, Antonio ;
Giampaoli, Marco ;
Corsi, Paolo ;
Bianchi, Lorenzo ;
Borghesi, Marco ;
Schiavina, Riccardo ;
Brunocilla, Eugenio ;
Wiklund, Peter ;
Porreca, Angelo .
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2019, 91 (01) :5-10
[5]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases [J].
Bollens, R ;
Vanden Bossche, M ;
Roumeguere, T ;
Damoun, A ;
Ekane, S ;
Hoffmann, P ;
Zlotta, AR ;
Schulman, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) :65-69
[6]  
Cao L., 2019, MEDICINE, V98, DOI DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000015770
[7]  
Chan Y. H., 2003, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V44, P391
[8]  
Chan Y. H., 2003, SMJ Singapore Medical Journal, V44, P498
[9]   Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :72-80
[10]  
Fujimoto M, 2014, J PHARMACOVIGILANCE, V2, P147, DOI [10.4172/2329-6887.1000147, DOI 10.4172/2329-6887.1000147]