The psychometric properties of an Arabic numeric pain rating scale for measuring osteoarthritis knee pain

被引:47
作者
Alghadir, Ahmad H. [1 ]
Anwer, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Iqbal, Zaheen Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Chair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Dr DY Patil Coll Physiotherapy, Dept Musculoskeletal Sci, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Knee; numeric rating scale; osteoarthritis; pain intensity; reliability; validity; HOME-BASED EXERCISE; VISUAL ANALOG; INTENSITY; PREVALENCE; EFFICACY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1129441
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aims of this study were to translate the numeric rating scale (NRS) into Arabic and to evaluate the test retest reliability and convergent validity of an Arabic Numeric Pain Rating Scale (ANPRS) for measuring pain in osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Methods: The English version of the NRS was translated into Arabic as per the translation process guidelines for patient-rated outcome scales. One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with OA of the knee who had experienced pain for more than 6 months were asked to report their pain levels on the ANPRS, visual analogue scale (VAS), and verbal rating scale (VRS). A second assessment was performed 48 h after the first to assess test retest reliability. The test retest reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The convergent validity was assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficient. In addition, the minimum detectable change (MDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were also assessed. Results: The repeatability of ANPRS was good to excellent (ICC 0.89). The SEM and MDC were 0.71 and 1.96, respectively. Significant correlations were found with the VAS and VRS scores (p <0.01). Conclusions: The Arabic numeric pain rating scale is a valid and reliable scale for measuring pain levels in OA of the knee.
引用
收藏
页码:2392 / 2397
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Gallasch Cristiane Helena, 2007, Rev Gaucha Enferm, V28, P260
  • [22] Hartrick Craig T, 2003, Pain Pract, V3, P310
  • [23] Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review
    Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen
    Fayers, Peter M.
    Haugen, Dagny F.
    Caraceni, Augusto
    Hanks, Geoffrey W.
    Loge, Jon H.
    Fainsinger, Robin
    Aass, Nina
    Kaasa, Stein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (06) : 1073 - 1093
  • [24] Jensen M.P., 2011, Handbook of Pain Assessment
  • [25] WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF LEVELS NEEDED IN PAIN INTENSITY MEASUREMENT
    JENSEN, MP
    TURNER, JA
    ROMANO, JM
    [J]. PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) : 387 - 392
  • [26] RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF OSTEO-ARTHROSIS
    KELLGREN, JH
    LAWRENCE, JS
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1957, 16 (04) : 494 - 502
  • [27] INTERPRETATION OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE CHANGES
    LYDICK, E
    EPSTEIN, RS
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) : 221 - 226
  • [28] METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN MEASUREMENT OF PAIN - COMPARISON BETWEEN VERBAL RATING SCALE AND VISUAL ANALOG SCALE
    OHNHAUS, EE
    ADLER, R
    [J]. PAIN, 1975, 1 (04) : 379 - 384
  • [29] Portney L.G., 2000, FDN CLIN RES APPL PR, V2