Allograft rejection of small bowel transplantation in pigs

被引:5
作者
Nishida, S [1 ]
Komokata, T [1 ]
Ogata, S [1 ]
Ikoma, A [1 ]
Hamada, N [1 ]
Matsumoto, H [1 ]
Ushijima, T [1 ]
Tanaka, K [1 ]
Yoshida, H [1 ]
Taira, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Kagoshima Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg 2, Kagoshima 890, Japan
来源
SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 1998年 / 28卷 / 11期
关键词
small bowel transplantation; allograft rejection; mucosal biopsy; pig;
D O I
10.1007/s005950050301
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Small bowel allograft rejection in large animals has yet to be well defined. There are no specific early signs of graft rejection, The present experiments were undertaken to compare acute small bowel allograft rejection in pigs with and without FK506 and also to examine the usefulness of mucosal biopsies. Thirty-six outbred Large-White pigs were divided into (1) group 1 (n = 9): nonimmunosuppressed recipients; (2) group 2 (n = 8): FK506-immunosuppressed recipients; (3) group 3 (n = 2): autotransplant controls; and (4) donors (n 17), Orthotopic small bowel transplantations were performed with Thiry-Vella loops for daily biopsies. The survival rate of group 2,vas significantly longer than that of group 1 (P < 0.05). One best survivor in group 2 was killed at postoperative day (POD) 365. Treatment by FK506 prevented rejection, but most of the pigs died of pneumonia. In group 1, rejection began on POD 3 and progressed to severe rejection rapidly within 7 days, In group 2, rejection began from POD 6 to POD 8, but either remained mild or spontaneously improved. The differences in the routine laboratory data and the tumor necrosis factor-alpha level were not evident between the groups. Histological studies of repeated graft biopsies are thus considered to be essential for detecting signs of graft rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1145
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ABUELMAGD K, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V179, P385
[2]  
ALESSIANI M, 1994, TRANSPLANT P, V26, P1606
[3]   MALTOSE ABSORPTION AS AN INDICATOR OF SMALL-INTESTINAL ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION [J].
BILLIAR, TR ;
GARBEROGLIO, C ;
SCHRAUT, WH .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 37 (01) :75-82
[4]  
COTRAN RS, 1994, ROBBINS PATHOLOGIC B, P194
[5]   SUCCESSFUL SMALL BOWEL ALLOTRANSPLANTATION IN DOGS WITH CYCLOSPORINE AND PREDNISONE [J].
DILIZPEREZ, HS ;
MCCLURE, J ;
BEDETTI, C ;
HONG, HQ ;
DESANTIBANES, E ;
SHAW, BW ;
VANTHIEL, D ;
IWATSUKI, S ;
STARZL, TE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1984, 37 (02) :126-129
[6]  
Fryer JP, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P77
[7]   SUCCESSFUL INTESTINAL TRANSPLANTATION IN PIGS TREATED WITH CYCLOSPORINE [J].
GRANT, D ;
DUFF, J ;
ZHONG, R ;
GARCIA, B ;
LIPOHAR, C ;
KEOWN, P ;
STILLER, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 45 (02) :279-284
[8]   A COMPARISON OF HETEROTOPIC AND ORTHOTOPIC INTESTINAL TRANSPLANTATION IN RATS [J].
GRANT, D ;
ZHONG, R ;
HURLBUT, D ;
GARCIA, B ;
CHEN, HF ;
LAMONT, D ;
WANG, PZ ;
STILLER, C ;
DUFF, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1991, 51 (05) :948-954
[9]  
GRANT RD, 1994, SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLA, P1
[10]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF FK506 VERSUS CSA AND PIG ATG IN A PORCINE MODEL OF SMALL-BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION [J].
GRUESSNER, RWG ;
FRYER, JP ;
FASOLA, C ;
NAKHLEH, RE ;
GRUESSNER, AC ;
KIM, S ;
DUNN, DL ;
PIRENNE, J ;
BEKERSKY, I ;
BENEDETTI, E ;
TROPPMANN, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 59 (02) :164-171