共 49 条
A conceptual process design towards CO2 emission reduction by integration of solar-based hydrogen production and injection into biomass-derived solid oxide fuel cell
被引:47
作者:
Cao, Yan
[1
]
Alsharif, Sameer
[2
]
Attia, El-Awady
[3
,4
]
Shamseldin, Mohamed A.
[5
]
Ibrahim, Banar Fareed
[6
]
机构:
[1] Xian Technol Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn, Xian 710021, Peoples R China
[2] Taif Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Engn, POB 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
[3] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Al Kharj 16273, Saudi Arabia
[4] Benha Univ, Fac Engn Shoubra, Mech Engn Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Future Univ Egypt, Fac Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, New Cairo 11845, Egypt
[6] Lebanese French Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Dept Informat Technol, Erbil, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq
关键词:
Biomass;
Solid oxide fuel cell;
Photovoltaic-thermal;
Hydrogen production;
Thermoeconomic;
Tri-objective optimization;
ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE;
MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;
ENVIRONMENTAL-ANALYSIS;
PROCESS SIMULATION;
GASIFICATION;
SYSTEM;
POWER;
SOFC;
ENERGY;
PERFORMANCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.050
中图分类号:
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号:
08 ;
0830 ;
摘要:
Integration of biomass gasification with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) is a promising technology, particularly for small scale decentralized power systems. In this paper, to reduce the CO2 emission and biomass consumption of this system, it is incorporated with solar-based hydrogen production. The produced hydrogen is injected into the biomass gasification-SOFC system, proposing two different configurations. In the first configuration, the hydrogen is injected into the anode inlet (to provide a hydrogen rich fuel), while in the second proposed configuration it is injected into the afterburner of the SOFC (to increase the gas turbine inlet temperature). The two proposed configurations are comprehensively assessed and compared from thermodynamic, environmental and economic standpoints. In thermoeconomic analysis, the negative environmental damage costs of CO2 emission, as the primary greenhouse gas, is taken into account. Also, a parametric study is conducted to ascertain the major design variables after which tri-objective optimization is performed based on CO2 emission, levelized cost of electricity and exergy efficiency. The results indicated superior performance for the system with hydrogen injection into the anode compared to the injection into the afterburner. The former configuration has 20.6% higher exergy efficiency with 23.2% lower emission and 14.0% lower levelized electricity cost. For this configuration under the optimum operation, the exergy efficiency, CO2 emission and electricity cost are found to be 24.85%, 0.257 kg/kWh and 0.0911 $/kWh, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 176
页数:13
相关论文