An analysis of differential item functioning by gender in the Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ)

被引:3
作者
Murray, Aja Louise [1 ]
Booth, Tom [1 ]
McKenzie, Karen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Northumbria Univ, Dept Psychol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire LDSQ; Differential item functioning; Measurement invariance; Intellectual disability; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.006
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ; McKenzie & Paxton, 2006) was developed as a brief screen for intellectual disability. Although several previous studies have evaluated the LDSQ with respect to its utility as a clinical and research tool, no studies have considered the fairness of the test across males and females. In the current study we, therefore, used a multi-group item response theory approach to assess differential item functioning across gender in a sample of 211 males and 132 females assessed in clinical and forensic settings. Although the test did not show evidence of differential item functioning by gender, it was necessary to exclude one item due to estimation problems and to combine two very highly related items (concerning reading and writing ability) into a single literacy item Thus, in addition to being generally supportive of the utility of the LDSQ our results also highlight possible areas of weakness in the tool and suggest possible amendments that could be made to test content to improve the test in future revisions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 82
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, STAT APPROACHES MEAS, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203821961
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Learning Disability: Definitions and Contexts
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, VINELAND ADAPTIVE BE
[4]   Measurement invariance versus selection invariance: Is fair selection possible? [J].
Borsboom, Denny ;
Romeijn, Jan-Willem ;
Wicherts, Jelte M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2008, 13 (02) :75-98
[5]  
Cai L., 2011, IRTPRO FLEXIBLE MULT, V1st
[6]   Local dependence indexes for item pairs: Using item response theory [J].
Chen, WH ;
Thissen, D .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 1997, 22 (03) :265-289
[7]  
Harrison P.L., 2003, ADAPTIVE BEHAV ASSES
[8]   Sex differences in mental abilities:: g masks the dimensions on which they lie [J].
Johnson, Wendy ;
Bouchard, Thomas J., Jr. .
INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 35 (01) :23-39
[9]   Testing Measurement Invariance: A Comparison of Multiple-Group Categorical CFA and IRT [J].
Kim, Eun Sook ;
Yoon, Myeongsun .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2011, 18 (02) :212-228
[10]  
Langer M., 2008, REEXAMINATION LORDS