Cross-Sectoral Resource Management: How Forest Management Alternatives Affect the Provision of Biomass and Other Ecosystem Services

被引:34
作者
Frank, Susanne [1 ]
Fuerst, Christine [1 ]
Pietzsch, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Res Dev Ctr, Dept Ecol & Nat Resources Management, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] PiSolution GmbH, D-04416 Markkleeberg, Germany
关键词
DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; LAND-USE; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRADE-OFFS; CO2; EMISSIONS; LANDSCAPE; AGRICULTURE; METHODOLOGY; MODELS;
D O I
10.3390/f6030533
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Integrated forest management is faced with the challenge that the contribution of forests to economic and ecological planning targets must be assessed in a socio-ecological system context. This paper introduces a way to model spatio-temporal dynamics of biomass production at a regional scale in order to derive land use strategies that enhance biomass provision and avoid trade-offs for other ecosystem services. The software platform GISCAME was employed to bridge the gap between local land management decisions and regional planning by linking growth and yield models with an integrative mesoscale modeling and assessment approach. The model region is located in Saxony, Germany. Five scenarios were simulated, which aimed at testing different alternatives for adapted land use in the context of climate change and increasing biomass demand. The results showed, for example, that forest conversion towards climate-change-adapted forest types had positive effects on ecological integrity and landscape aesthetics. In contrast, negative impacts on landscape aesthetics must be expected if agricultural sites were converted into short rotation coppices. Uncertainties with stem from assumptions regarding growth and yield models were discussed. Future developmental steps which consider, for example, accessibility of the resources were identified.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 560
页数:28
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Albert C., 2010, LANDSC ONLINE, V19, P1, DOI [10.3097/LO.201019, DOI 10.3097/LO.201019]
[2]   Methodology for optimization of distributed biomass resources evaluation, management and final energy use [J].
Alfonso, D. ;
Perpina, C. ;
Perez-Navarro, A. ;
Penalvo, E. ;
Vargas, C. ;
Cardenas, R. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2009, 33 (08) :1070-1079
[3]   Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops [J].
Arciniegas, Gustavo ;
Janssen, Ron .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (03) :332-342
[4]   Biofuels agriculture: landscape-scale trade-offs between fuel, economics, carbon, energy, food, and fiber [J].
Bryan, Brett A. ;
King, Darran ;
Wang, Enli .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2010, 2 (06) :330-345
[5]   A framework for reviewing the trade-offs between, renewable energy, food, feed and wood production at a local level [J].
Burgess, Paul J. ;
Casado, Monica Rivas ;
Gavu, Jerry ;
Mead, Andrew ;
Cockerill, Tim ;
Lord, Richard ;
van der Horst, Dan ;
Howard, David C. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (01) :129-142
[6]   Development of a dynamic strategy planning theory and system for sustainable river basin land use management [J].
Chen, CH ;
Liu, WL ;
Liaw, SL ;
Yu, CH .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 346 (1-3) :17-37
[7]  
Commission of the European Communities Biomass action plan, SEC20051573 COMM EUR
[8]  
Deberis, 2011, AN POT EN BIOM SOW A, P36
[9]  
Dittmar O., 1986, DDR BUCHENERTRAGSTAF, P57
[10]  
DLG e. V, 2012, FACHZ LAND ERN AUSSC