SENSORY EVALUATION OF PINEAPPLE CULTIVARS FOR CONSUMPTION IN NATURA

被引:12
作者
Berilli, Savio da Silva [1 ]
Almeida, Selma Bergara [2 ]
Cordeiro de Carvalho, Almy Junior [2 ]
Freitas, Silvio de Jesus [2 ]
Candido Gabriel Berilli, Ana Paula [1 ]
dos Santos, Paulo Cesar [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Fed Espirito Santo, Campus Itapina, Vitoria, Spain
[2] Univ Estadual Norte Fluminense, Campos, Brazil
关键词
Ananas comosus; Vitoria cultivars; acceptance; fusariosis; consumer; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-29452011000500081
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The pineapple orchards in Brazil often presents losses of plants and fruits caused by fusariosis, because the current cultivars are susceptive to that disease. New resistant cultivars have been available. However, there are no records about their sensory evaluations by consumers. The objective of this work was to evaluate the sensory acceptability of two new cultivars resistant to Fusarium, Vitoria and EC-93, by comparing them with other ones already established in the fresh fruits market, Perola and Gold. The fruits were evaluated by 52 consumers using 9-points hedonic scale for aroma, flavor, texture, global impression, appearance of the slice, appearance of the fruit, using the right scale for ideal acidity and sweetness and using 5-points scale for purchase intention. It was also evaluated SS, ATTN and SS/AT. The cultivar Gold had the highest means of acceptance for most of the parameters evaluated, whereas the cv CS-93, the lowest. Except for the attribute appearance of slice, the Vitoria cultivar did not differ from the most accepted cultivars in the evaluated parameters. The fruits differed significantly in the TSS, between 12.0 and 16.0 Brix, TA between 0.52 and 0.81% citric acid and ratio between 19.12 and 28.46. Among the cultivars resistant to Fusarium, the results suggest a low potential market for the EC-93 and a higher one for Vitoria.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 598
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] CUNHA G. D., 2007, MAGISTRA CRUZ ALMAS, V19, P219
  • [12] GONCALVES N.B.E., 2000, ABACAXI POS COLHEITA
  • [13] IAC-Instituto Agronomico de Campinas, 2010, SAO PAUL LANC CULT A
  • [14] *INCAPER, 2006, 148 INCAPER
  • [15] MACFIE HJH, 1990, NUTR REV, V48, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.1990.tb02910.x
  • [16] MANGIAVACCHI P.M., 2010, ENCONTRO INICIACAO C, P15
  • [17] [MAPA http://www.embrapa.gov.br/imprensa/noticias/2003/maio/bn.2004-11-25.1029961427/], 2004, NOV HIBR RES FUS LAN
  • [18] OMS - World Health Organization, 2004, OMS WORLD HLTH ASS, V57
  • [19] Reinhardt Domingo Haroldo, 2004, Rev. Bras. Frutic., V26, P544, DOI 10.1590/S0100-29452004000300041
  • [20] Teixeira L. J. Q., 2006, Revista Ceres, V53, P366