IMPLICATIONS OF STATIC-99 FIELD RELIABILITY FINDINGS FOR SCORE USE AND REPORTING

被引:20
作者
Boccaccini, Marcus T. [1 ]
Murrie, Daniel C. [2 ]
Mercado, Cynthia [3 ]
Quesada, Stephen [3 ]
Hawes, Samuel
Rice, Amanda K.
Jeglic, Elizabeth L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Psychol, Huntsville, TX 77341 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] CUNY John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, New York, NY 10019 USA
关键词
Static-99; field reliability; rater agreement; sexually violent predator; risk assessment; SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS; CIVIL COMMITMENT; SEX OFFENDERS; RISK ASSESSMENTS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1177/0093854811427131
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Static-99 is a well-researched measure used in many courtroom and correctional settings to help make decisions about sexual offenders. But, as with most forensic assessment measures, we know much more about interrater agreement for the Static-99 in formal research studies than in routine forensic and correctional practice. This study describes "field reliability" for the Static-99 in two states that use the Static-99 for routine correctional procedures, Texas (N = 600) and New Jersey (N = 135). Rater agreement coefficients were strong for Static-99 total scores (intraclass correlations = .79 and .88), but the total scores assigned by pairs of evaluators differed for approximately 45% of offenders in each state. Because each individual Static-99 score has a unique interpretation, and a 1-point difference in a Static-99 score can have substantial practical implications for decision making, these findings suggest the need for administration procedures or interpretation methods that acknowledge and account for measurement error in Static-99 total scores.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 58
页数:17
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Harris A., 2003, Coding rules for the Static-99 Revised. Corrections research: Manuals and forms
[12]  
HELMUS L, 2008, STATIC 99 REPLICATIO
[13]  
Helmus L., 2009, THESIS CARLETON U OT
[14]  
HELMUS L, SEXUAL ABUS IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1177/1079063211409951
[15]  
*INT COMM AD OFF S, 2007, SO ASS INF SURV 4
[16]   Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts [J].
Jackson, Rebecca L. ;
Hess, Derek T. .
SEXUAL ABUSE-A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 19 (04) :425-448
[17]   Factors predicting selection of sexually violent predators for civil commitment [J].
Levenson, Jill S. ;
Morin, John W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2006, 50 (06) :609-629
[18]   Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders [J].
Levenson, JS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2004, 48 (06) :638-648
[19]  
MERCADO CC, 2010, S ANN CONV ASS TREAT
[20]   RATER (DIS)AGREEMENT ON RISK ASSESSMENT MEASURES IN SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR PROCEEDINGS Evidence of Adversarial Allegiance in Forensic Evaluation? [J].
Murrie, Daniel C. ;
Boccaccini, Marcus T. ;
Turner, Darrel B. ;
Meeks, Meredith ;
Woods, Carol ;
Tussey, Chriscelyn .
PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2009, 15 (01) :19-53