Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children

被引:28
作者
Goel, Shiba [1 ]
Bhardwaj, Neerja [1 ]
Jain, Kajal [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
anesthesia : pediatric; technique : laryngeal mask airway; anesthetic : propofol; co-induction; midazolam; ketamine;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02563.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: Use of midazolam and ketamine lowers the induction dose of propofol (co-induction) producing hemodynamic stability. Background: Large doses of propofol needed for induction and laryngeal mask (LM) insertion in children may be associated with hemodynamic and respiratory effects. Co-induction has the advantage of reducing dose and therefore maintaining hemodynamic stability. Aim: To examine the effect of co-induction on hemodynamics, LM insertion and recovery in children. Methods/Materials: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted in 60 ASA I/II children, age 1-8 years. Normal saline, ketamine 0.5 mg.kg(-1), midazolam 0.05 mg.kg(-1) were administered in groups P (propofol), PK (propofol-ketamine) and PM (propofol-midazolam), respectively, 2 min prior to the administration of the induction dose of propofol. Propofol 3.5 mg.kg(-1) (group P) or 2.5 mg.kg(-1) (groups PK and PM) was used for induction, LM inserted 30 s later and insertion conditions assessed. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded immediately after propofol bolus, then every min till 2 min after LMA insertion. Recovery was assessed using Steward's Score. Result: In group P, systolic blood pressure (SBP) showed a significantly greater decrease compared to group PK and group PM (P < 0.005). Only 5% of patients in groups PK and PM showed > 20% fall in SBP compared to 89% in group P (P < 0.005). More children in groups PK and PM had acceptable conditions for LM insertion compared to group P (P < 0.05). The time to achieve Steward Score of 6 was longer in groups PK and PM compared to group P (P < 0.005). Conclusion: In children, the combination of propofol with ketamine or midazolam produces stable hemodynamics and improved LM insertion conditions but is associated with delayed recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 634
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization [J].
Akin, A ;
Esmaoglu, A ;
Guler, G ;
Demircioglu, R ;
Narin, N ;
Boyaci, A .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) :553-557
[2]   DOSE OF PROPOFOL REQUIRED TO INSERT THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN CHILDREN [J].
ALLSOP, E ;
INNES, P ;
JACKSON, M ;
CUNLIFFE, M .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 5 (01) :47-51
[3]  
[Anonymous], PAEDIAT ANAESTH
[4]   Midazolam premedication delays recovery after propofol without modifying involuntary movements [J].
Bevan, JC ;
Veall, GRO ;
Macnab, AJ ;
Ries, CR ;
Marsland, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (01) :50-54
[5]  
BHARDWAJ N, 2005, J ANAESTH CLIN PHARM, V21, P45
[6]   HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES DURING ANESTHESIA INDUCED AND MAINTAINED WITH PROPOFOL [J].
CLAEYS, MA ;
GEPTS, E ;
CAMU, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (01) :3-9
[7]   Effect of midazolam pretreatment on induction dose requirements of propofol in combination with fentanyl in younger and older adults [J].
Cressey, DM ;
Claydon, P ;
Bhaskaran, NC ;
Reilly, CS .
ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (02) :108-113
[8]   Propofol auto-co-induction as an alternative to midazolam co-induction for ambulatory surgery [J].
Djaiani, G ;
Ribes-Pastor, MP .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (01) :63-67
[9]   Co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion - A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol [J].
Driver, I ;
Wilson, C ;
Wiltshire, S ;
Mills, P ;
HowardGriffin, R .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (07) :698-700
[10]   Midazolam co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion [J].
Driver, IK ;
Wiltshire, S ;
Mills, P ;
Lillywhite, N ;
HowardGriffin, R .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (08) :782-784