Multiplicity: an organizing principle for cancers and somatic mutations

被引:1
作者
Frey, Lewis J. [1 ,2 ]
Piccolo, Stephen R. [1 ,2 ]
Edgerton, Mary E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biomed Informat, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS | 2011年 / 4卷
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; GENOMIC LANDSCAPES; COLORECTAL-CANCER; EGFR; GLIOBLASTOMA; CARCINOMA; PATTERNS; KINASES; GENES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/1755-8794-4-52
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: With the advent of whole-genome analysis for profiling tumor tissue, a pressing need has emerged for principled methods of organizing the large amounts of resulting genomic information. We propose the concept of multiplicity measures on cancer and gene networks to organize the information in a clinically meaningful manner. Multiplicity applied in this context extends Fearon and Vogelstein's multi-hit genetic model of colorectal carcinoma across multiple cancers. Methods: Using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), we construct networks of interacting cancers and genes. Multiplicity is calculated by evaluating the number of cancers and genes linked by the measurement of a somatic mutation. The Kamada-Kawai algorithm is used to find a two-dimensional minimum energy solution with multiplicity as an input similarity measure. Cancers and genes are positioned in two dimensions according to this similarity. A third dimension is added to the network by assigning a maximal multiplicity to each cancer or gene. Hierarchical clustering within this three-dimensional network is used to identify similar clusters in somatic mutation patterns across cancer types. Results: The clustering of genes in a three-dimensional network reveals a similarity in acquired mutations across different cancer types. Surprisingly, the clusters separate known causal mutations. The multiplicity clustering technique identifies a set of causal genes with an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 versus 0.57 when clustering on gene mutation rate alone. The cluster multiplicity value and number of causal genes are positively correlated via Spearman's Rank Order correlation (r(s)(8) = 0.894, Spearman's t = 17.48, p < 0.05). A clustering analysis of cancer types segregates different types of cancer. All blood tumors cluster together, and the cluster multiplicity values differ significantly (Kruskal-Wallis, H = 16.98, df = 2, p < 0.05). Conclusion: We demonstrate the principle of multiplicity for organizing somatic mutations and cancers in clinically relevant clusters. These clusters of cancers and mutations provide representations that identify segregations of cancer and genes driving cancer progression.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CATALOGUE SOMATIC MU
  • [2] Arends JW, 2000, J PATHOL, V190, P412
  • [3] A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer
    Berns, Katrien
    Horlings, Hugo M.
    Hennessy, Bryan T.
    Madiredjo, Mandy
    Hijmans, E. Marielle
    Beelen, Karin
    Linn, Sabine C.
    Gonzalez-Angulo, Ana Maria
    Stemke-Hale, Katherine
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Beijersbergen, Roderick L.
    Mills, Gordon B.
    de Vijver, Marc J. van
    Bernards, Rene
    [J]. CANCER CELL, 2007, 12 (04) : 395 - 402
  • [4] Genomic landscapes of cancers: prospects for targeted therapies
    Bleeker, Fonnet E.
    Bardelli, Alberta
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2007, 8 (12) : 1629 - 1633
  • [5] Mapping the cancer genome - Pinpointing the genes involved in cancer will help chart a new course across the complex landscape of human malignancies
    Collins, Francis S.
    Barker, Anna D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2007, 296 (03) : 50 - 57
  • [6] Genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer
    de la Chapelle, A
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2004, 4 (10) : 769 - 780
  • [7] Edge SB., 2009, AJCC cancer staging manual, V7th
  • [8] A GENETIC MODEL FOR COLORECTAL TUMORIGENESIS
    FEARON, ER
    VOGELSTEIN, B
    [J]. CELL, 1990, 61 (05) : 759 - 767
  • [9] COSMIC 2005
    Forbes, S
    Clements, J
    Dawson, E
    Bamford, S
    Webb, T
    Dogan, A
    Flanagan, A
    Teague, J
    Wooster, R
    Futreal, PA
    Stratton, MR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 94 (02) : 318 - 322
  • [10] FUTREAL PA, 2009, CANCER, V4, P177