Impacts of ethanol policy on corn prices: A review and meta-analysis of recent evidence

被引:76
作者
Condon, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Klemick, Heather [1 ]
Wolverton, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Econ, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] DC Water & Sewer Author, External Affairs, Washington, DC 20032 USA
关键词
Ethanol; Biofuels; Renewable fuel standard; Commodity prices; Meta-analysis; LAND-USE CHANGE; BIOFUEL POLICIES; ALTERNATIVE BIOFUEL; FOOD; MANDATES; ENERGY; EMISSIONS; BENEFITS; WELFARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.12.007
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The literature on the impacts of biofuels on agricultural commodity prices is characterized by contradictory findings. We review studies published between 2007 and 2014 that estimate the effects of U.S. corn ethanol policy on corn prices and find estimates ranging from nil to over 80%. Such divergent results make it difficult to assess the merits of alternative biofuel policies. To bring more clarity to the issue and facilitate comparisons across studies, we assemble a database of over 150 medium-to-long run estimates of the effect of corn ethanol production on corn prices from 29 published studies. We first normalize corn price impacts by the change in corn ethanol volume to control for the large differences in ethanol quantities across scenarios. We then conduct a meta-analysis to identify the factors that drive the remaining variation in corn price impacts across studies. In addition to ethanol volumes, we find that modeling framework, projection year, inclusion of ethanol co-products, and biofuel production from other feedstocks explain much of the differences in price effects. The results indicate that a one billion gallon expansion of the US corn ethanol mandate in the year 2015 would lead to a three to four percent increase in corn prices, with smaller price changes projected in future years. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 73
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[61]   The impacts of biofuels targets on land-use change and food supply: A global CGE assessment [J].
Timilsina, Govinda R. ;
Beghin, John C. ;
van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique ;
Mevel, Simon .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 43 (03) :315-332
[62]  
Trostle Robert., 2008, Global Agricultural Supply and Demand: Factors Contributing to the Recent Increase in Food Commodity Prices
[63]  
Tyner W., 2012, FARM FDN PAPER
[64]   Policy options for integrated energy and agricultural markets [J].
Tyner, Wallace E. ;
Taheripour, Farzad .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (03) :387-396
[65]   Biofuels and food prices: Separating wheat from chaff [J].
Tyner, Wallace E. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 2 (02) :126-130
[66]   Comparison of fixed versus variable biofuels incentives [J].
Tyner, Wallace E. ;
Taheripour, Farzad ;
Perkis, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (10) :5530-5540
[67]  
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014, OCE20141 USDA
[68]  
U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, 2013, FEED GRAINS DAT CUST
[69]  
U.S. Department of Energy, 2011, EN EFF REN EN ALT AD
[70]   Valuing water quality improvements in the United States using meta-analysis: Is the glass half-full or half-empty for national policy analysis? [J].
Van Houtven, George ;
Powers, John ;
Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (03) :206-228