Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting

被引:71
作者
Koopman, Axel S. [1 ]
Kingma, Idsart [1 ]
de Looze, Michiel P. [1 ,2 ]
van Dieen, Jaap H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Van der Boechorstr 9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] TNO, Leiden, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Low-back pain; Mechanical loading; Passive exoskeletons; Compression forces; Lifting; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ERECTOR SPINAE; RISK-FACTORS; WORK; BODY; EMG; MODEL; MUSCULATURE; MUSCLES; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109486
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Low-back pain is the number one cause of disability in the world, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. Exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace to reduce low back loading. During static forward bending, exoskeletons have been shown to reduce back muscle activity by 10% to 40%. However, effects during dynamic lifting are not well documented. Relative support of the exoskeleton might be smaller in lifting compared to static bending due to higher peak loads. In addition, exoskeletons might also result in changes in lifting behavior, which in turn could affect low back loading. The present study investigated the effect of a passive exoskeleton on peak compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during symmetric lifting. Two types (LOW and HIGH) of the device, which generate peak support moments at large and moderate flexion angles, respectively, were tested during lifts from knee and ankle height from a near and far horizontal position, with a load of 10?kg. Both types of the trunk exoskeleton tested here reduced the peak L5S1 compression force by around 5-10% for lifts from the FAR position from both KNEE and ANKLE height. Subjects did adjust their lifting style when wearing the device with a 17% reduced peak trunk angular velocity and 5 degrees increased lumbar flexion, especially during ANKLE height lifts. In conclusion, the exoskeleton had a minor and varying effect on the peak L5S1 compression force with only significant differences in the FAR lifts. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting
    Abdoli-E, Mohammad
    Stevenson, Joan M.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 23 (03) : 372 - 380
  • [2] An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks
    Abdoli-E, Mohammad
    Agnew, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Joan M.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 21 (05) : 456 - 465
  • [3] A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting
    Alemi, Mohammad Mehdi
    Geissinger, Jack
    Simon, Athulya A.
    Chang, S. Emily
    Asbeck, Alan T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2019, 47 : 25 - 34
  • [4] [Anonymous], SPINE
  • [5] [Anonymous], CLIN BIOMECHANICS
  • [6] [Anonymous], IISE T OCCUPATIONAL
  • [7] Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models
    Arjmand, N.
    Gagnon, D.
    Plamondon, A.
    Shirazi-Adl, A.
    Lariviere, C.
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 24 (07) : 533 - 541
  • [8] Computation of trunk equilibrium and stability in free flexion-extension movements at different velocities
    Bazrgari, B.
    Shirazi-Adl, A.
    Trottier, M.
    Mathieu, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (02) : 412 - 421
  • [9] The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work
    Bosch, Tim
    van Eck, Jennifer
    Knitel, Karlijn
    de Looze, Michiel
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 54 : 212 - 217
  • [10] PREDICTION OF THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HUMAN LUMBAR VERTEBRAE
    BRINCKMANN, P
    BIGGEMANN, M
    HILWEG, D
    [J]. SPINE, 1989, 14 (06) : 606 - 610