18F-FDG PET/CT and Melanoma Value of Fourth and Subsequent Posttherapy Follow-up Scans for Patient Management

被引:13
作者
Mena, Esther [1 ]
Taghipour, Mehdi [1 ]
Sheikhbahaei, Sara [1 ]
Mirpour, Sahar [1 ]
Xiao, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Subramaniam, Rathan M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, 601 N Caroline St JHOC 3235, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Sidney Kimmel Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Armstrong Inst Patient Safety & Qual, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
F-18-FDG; clinical suspicion; melanoma; PET/CT; treatment management; STAGE-III MELANOMA; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; LATE RECURRENCE; CANCER VALUE; FDG PET/CT; CT; TOMOGRAPHY; CARCINOMA; RADIATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1097/RLU.0000000000001275
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the added value of performing fourth and subsequent follow-up F-18-FDG-PET/CT scans to clinical assessment and impact on the patient's management in patients with melanoma. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 232 biopsy-proven melanoma patients who underwent F-18-FDG-PET/CT scans. Of these, 71 patients had 4 or more follow-up F-18-FDG-PET/CT scans after completion of primary treatment, with a total of 246 fourth or subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans. The added value of each follow-up PET/CT scan to the patient's clinical assessment and treatment management was established. Kaplan-Meier plots with a Mantel-Cox log-rank test were used to establish the patient's overall survival. Results: Of the 246 fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans, 61% (150/246) were negative for malignancy, and 39.0% (96/246) were positive for recurrence/metastases. FDG-PET/CT was helpful in identifying malignancy in 6.5% of the scans performed without prior clinical suspicion, which ruled out malignancy in 28.5% of the scans obtained with prior clinical signs suggestive of recurrence or for secondary therapy assessment. The PET/CT scan resulted in change of the patient'smanagement in approximately 16.7% (41/246) of the scans. Change in management was significantly greater in patients whose scans were done with prior clinical signs suggestive of malignancy, or for therapy assessment than without prior clinical suspicion (29.3% vs 4.1%; P < 0.0001). Statistically significant difference was seen in the overall survival between patients with at least 1 positive and all negative fourth and subsequent follow-up PET/CT scans at patient level (P = 0.001). Conclusions: The fourth and subsequent F-18-FDG-PET/CT scans obtained after completion of primary treatment added value to clinical assessment in patients with melanoma. Patients with clinical signs suggestive of recurrence or metastases or being monitored for treatment response are more likely to benefit from the fourth or subsequent FDG PET/CT than those without prior clinical suspicion.
引用
收藏
页码:E403 / E409
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Evolving Role of FDG PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma Imaging and Management
    Agarwal, Ankit
    Chirindel, Alin
    Shah, Bhartesh A.
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (04) : 884 - 890
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, CANC FACTS FIG 2015
  • [3] Routine restaging PET/CT and detection of initial recurrence in sentinel lymph node positive stage III melanoma
    Baker, Justin J.
    Meyers, Michael O.
    Frank, Jill
    Amos, Keith D.
    Stitzenberg, Karyn B.
    Ollila, David W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 207 (04) : 549 - 554
  • [4] A Multicenter Phase I Dose Escalation Trial to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of Intra-arterial Temozolomide for Patients with Advanced Extremity Melanoma Using Normothermic Isolated Limb Infusion
    Beasley, Georgia M.
    Speicher, Paul
    Augustine, Christina K.
    Dolber, Paul C.
    Peterson, Bercedis L.
    Sharma, Ketan
    Mosca, Paul J.
    Royal, Richard
    Ross, Merrick
    Zager, Jonathan S.
    Tyler, Douglas S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 287 - 294
  • [5] Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure
    Brenner, David J.
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) : 2277 - 2284
  • [6] Surveillance after surgical treatment of melanoma: Futility of routine chest radiography
    Brown, Russell E.
    Stromberg, Arnold J.
    Hagendoorn, Lee J.
    Hulsewede, Deborah Y.
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Noyes, R. Dirk
    Goydos, James S.
    Urist, Marshall M.
    Edwards, Michael J.
    Scoggins, Charles R.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    [J]. SURGERY, 2010, 148 (04) : 711 - 716
  • [7] LATE RECURRENCE OF MALIGNANT-MELANOMA - ANALYSIS OF 168 PATIENTS
    CROWLEY, NJ
    SEIGLER, HF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 212 (02) : 173 - 177
  • [8] PET-Based Primary Tumor Volumetric Parameters and Survival of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
    Davison, Jessica
    Mercier, Gustavo
    Russo, Gregory
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (03) : 635 - 640
  • [9] PET/CT of Cancer Patients: Part 1, Pancreatic Neoplasms
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Karantanis, Dimitrios
    Mercier, Gustavo
    Peller, Patrick J.
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (05) : 952 - 967
  • [10] DiFronzo LA, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P1520, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8<1520::AID-CNCR1160>3.0.CO