On the correlations between galaxy properties and supermassive black hole mass

被引:190
|
作者
Beifiori, A. [1 ,2 ]
Courteau, S. [3 ]
Corsini, E. M. [4 ]
Zhu, Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Extraterr Phys, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Inst Cosmol & Gravitat, Portsmouth PO1 3FX, Hants, England
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Phys Engn Phys & Astron, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[4] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Astron, I-35122 Padua, Italy
关键词
black hole physics; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: photometry; galaxies: statistics; DARK-MATTER HALOES; DIGITAL SKY SURVEY; LOG-QUADRATIC RELATION; BH-SIGMA RELATION; VELOCITY DISPERSIONS; ELLIPTIC GALAXIES; FUNDAMENTAL RELATION; UPPER LIMITS; BULGE MASS; STRUCTURAL-PROPERTIES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19903.x
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We use a large sample of upper limits and accurate estimates of supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses coupled with libraries of host galaxy velocity dispersions, rotational velocities and photometric parameters extracted from Sloan Digital Sky Survey i-band images to establish correlations between the SMBH and host galaxy parameters. We test whether the mass of the black hole, M., is fundamentally driven by either local or global galaxy properties. We explore correlations between M. and stellar velocity dispersion sigma(e), i-band bulge luminosity L-i,L-bulge, bulge mass M-bulge, bulge Sersic index n, bulge mean effective surface brightness <mu(e,bulge)>, i-band luminosity of the galaxy L-i,L-gal, galaxy stellar mass M-star,M-gal, maximum circular velocity V-c, and galaxy dynamical and effective masses M-dyn,M-gal and M-e,M-gal. We verify the tightness of the M.-sigma(e) relation and find that correlations with other galaxy parameters do not yield tighter trends. We do not find differences in the M.-sigma(e) relation of barred and unbarred galaxies. The M.-sigma(e) relation of pseudo-bulges is also coarser and has a different slope than that involving classical bulges. The M.-M-bulge is not as tight as the M.-sigma(e) relation, despite the bulge mass proving to be a better proxy of M. than bulge luminosity, and despite adding the bulge effective radius as an additional fitting parameter. Contrary to various published reports, we find a rather poor correlation between M. and n (or <mu(e,bulge)>), suggesting that M. is not related to the bulge light concentration. The correlations between M. and galaxy luminosity or mass are not a marked improvement over the M.-sigma(e) relation. These scaling relations depend sensitively on the host galaxy morphology: early-type galaxies follow a tighter relation than late-type galaxies. If V-c is a proxy for the dark matter halo mass, the large scatter of the M.-V-c relation then suggests that M. is more coupled to the baryonic rather than the dark matter. We have tested the need for a third parameter in the M. scaling relations, through various linear correlations with bulge and galaxy parameters, only to confirm that the Fundamental Plane of the SMBH is mainly driven by sigma(e) with a small tilt due to the effective radius. We provide a compendium of galaxy structural properties for most of the SMBH hosts known to date.
引用
收藏
页码:2497 / 2528
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A correlation between galaxy light concentration and supermassive black hole mass
    Graham, AW
    Erwin, P
    Caon, N
    Trujillo, I
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 563 (01): : L11 - L14
  • [2] A correlation between supermassive black hole mass and galaxy light concentration
    Graham, AW
    Erwin, P
    Caon, N
    Trujillo, I
    DISKS OF GALAXIES: KINEMATICS, DYNAMICS AND PERTURBATIONS, 2002, 275 : 87 - 87
  • [3] A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE MASS AND THE TOTAL GRAVITATIONAL MASS OF THE HOST GALAXY
    Bandara, Kaushala
    Crampton, David
    Simard, Luc
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 704 (02): : 1135 - 1145
  • [4] Supermassive black hole mass regulated by host galaxy morphology
    Watabe, Y.
    Kawakatu, N.
    Imanishi, M.
    Takeuchi, T. T.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 400 (04) : 1803 - 1807
  • [5] Host galaxy bulge predictors of supermassive black hole mass
    Aller, M. C.
    Richstone, D. O.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 665 (01): : 120 - 156
  • [6] The Supermassive Black Hole—Galaxy Connection
    Andrew King
    Space Science Reviews, 2014, 183 : 427 - 451
  • [7] The Supermassive Black Hole-Galaxy Connection
    King, Andrew
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2014, 183 (1-4) : 427 - 451
  • [8] The relationship between black hole mass and galaxy properties: examining the black hole feedback model in IllustrisTNG
    Terrazas, Bryan A.
    Bell, Eric F.
    Pillepich, Annalisa
    Nelson, Dylan
    Somerville, Rachel S.
    Genel, Shy
    Weinberger, Rainer
    Habouzit, Melanie
    Li, Yuan
    Hernquist, Lars
    Vogelsberger, Mark
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 493 (02) : 1888 - 1906
  • [9] A relation between supermassive black hole mass and quasar metallicity?
    Warner, C
    Hamann, F
    Dietrich, M
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 596 (01): : 72 - 84
  • [10] M33: A galaxy with no supermassive black hole
    Gebhardt, K
    Lauer, TR
    Kormendy, J
    Pinkney, J
    Bower, GA
    Green, R
    Gull, T
    Hutchings, JB
    Kaiser, ME
    Nelson, CH
    Richstone, D
    Weistrop, D
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 122 (05): : 2469 - 2476