Task content routinisation, technological change and labour turnover: Evidence from China

被引:9
作者
Du, Yuhong [1 ]
Wei, Xiahai [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Huaqiao Univ, Inst Econ Dev & Reform IEDR, Econ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chinese labour market; labour turnover; Lewis turning point; routine intensity index; routine-biased technological change; routinisation; skill-based technological change; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; JOB POLARIZATION; OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE; SKILLED LABOR; EMPLOYMENT; DEMAND; INNOVATION; ROUTINE; WAGE;
D O I
10.1177/1035304620921569
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article addresses the unresolved question of whether recent technological change causes job instability in a non-western context. China is now the world's largest user of industrial robots. A Lewis turning point has been predicted, involving a transition from a plentiful supply of rural low-cost workers to a labour shortage economy in which rising labour costs drive labour-technology substitution. The routine-biased technological change hypothesis suggests that technology-induced routinisation in job task content has a profound impact on employment structure. This study captures the extent of routinisation of jobs in the transitional context of China and examines the incidence and impact of routinisation on labour turnover in the labour market. Using rotating panel data from the China Labour-force Dynamics Survey 2012, 2014 and 2016, this study, based on individual information with regard to flexibility in work schedules and degree of autonomy in workload and task content on the job, follows a recently developed measure to construct a routine intensity index and indicates a division into three routine intensity groups. The empirical findings show that the probability of job mobility is significantly increased with the magnitude of routine task intensity, suggesting that the process of technology-induced routinisation is strongly associated with labour turnover. JEL Codes: J63, J20
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 346
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D, 2011, HBK ECON, V4, P1043, DOI 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5
[2]  
Alfonso S., 2007, Journal of Socioeconomics, V3, P859, DOI [10.1016/j.socec.2007.01.022, DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2007.01.022]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends
[4]   The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Dorn, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (05) :1553-1597
[5]   The polarization of the US labor market [J].
Autor, DH ;
Katz, LF ;
Kearney, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (02) :189-194
[6]   The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration [J].
Autor, DH ;
Levy, F ;
Murnane, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1279-1333
[7]   R&D, embodied technological change, and employment: evidence from Italian microdata [J].
Barbieri, Laura ;
Piva, Mariacristina ;
Vivarelli, Marco .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2019, 28 (01) :203-218
[8]   CHANGES IN THE DEMAND FOR SKILLED LABOR WITHIN UNITED-STATES MANUFACTURING - EVIDENCE FROM THE ANNUAL SURVEY OF MANUFACTURES [J].
BERMAN, E ;
BOUND, J ;
GRILICHES, Z .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :367-397
[9]   Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence [J].
Berman, E ;
Bound, J ;
Machin, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (04) :1245-1279